Skip to content

Conversation

pakrym-oai
Copy link
Collaborator

It's a bit hand-holdy in that it pre-downloads issue list but that keeps codex running in read-only no-network mode.

@pakrym-oai pakrym-oai changed the title Add issue deduplicator action Add issue deduplicator workflow Oct 2, 2025
@pakrym-oai
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@codex find 5 problems with this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Copy link
Contributor

Summary

View task →

});

- name: Remove codex-deduplicate label
if: ${{ always() && github.event.action == 'labeled' && github.event.label.name == 'codex-deduplicate' }}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why always()?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so even if the action fails the label is removed and someone can add it again to retry

@pakrym-oai pakrym-oai merged commit 62cc8a4 into main Oct 2, 2025
19 checks passed
@pakrym-oai pakrym-oai deleted the pakrym/add-issue-deduplicator-action branch October 2, 2025 21:36
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants