-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8307347: serviceability/sa/ClhsdbDumpclass.java could leave files owned by root on macOS #13791
Conversation
👋 Welcome back azeller! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@ArnoZeller The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable.
@ArnoZeller This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 56 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@tstuefe, @plummercj) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
/reviewers 2 |
@plummercj |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good. Is there a reason why this was not noticed when JDK-8290687 was filed and fixed last year?
@plummercj : I tried to find out why we did not see it when JDK-8290687 was fixed but I am unable to find a reason :-(. |
@tstuefe and @plummercj |
/sponsor |
@tstuefe The change author (@ArnoZeller) must issue an |
/integrate |
@ArnoZeller |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 5c7ede9.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealCLanger @ArnoZeller Pushed as commit 5c7ede9. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Unless this test is run as root, it needs sudo privileges. If it gets them, the test runs fine, but leaves a file with root ownership. So jtreg cannot delete it, and you see errors when "make clean" tries to delete it.
It's best that we just don't run the test on OSX if sudo privileges.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13791/head:pull/13791
$ git checkout pull/13791
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13791
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13791/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13791
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13791
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13791.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment