Skip to content

Conversation

JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-pick of #501

Replaces #523 as there were conflicts that needed to be manually resolved

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814582, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1814589 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1814589 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

Bug 1814582: [release-4.4] [OCPCLOUD-774] Add Node startup timeout API field

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 22, 2020
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link

/approve

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2020
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Jun 22, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Danil-Grigorev, enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 22, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@shawn-hurley
Copy link

@JoelSpeed

This looks like a feature backports to me (addition of field to a type is what is concerning me.) Can we get justification for the need of this backport?

/cc @mrunalp

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Jun 26, 2020

This looks like a feature backports to me (addition of field to a type is what is concerning me.) Can we get justification for the need of this backport?

This is to bug fix a hardcoded narrow timeout consistently with what we do in higher releases. To proactively avoid seeing issues where the timeout wouldn’t be enough and avoid having api skew. The API change is additive and backward compatible with existing default behaviour.

I think we can skip back porting this though and reconsider if we see a customer case coming through if that make sense @JoelSpeed @shawn-hurley .

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds reasonable to me! We can reopen if ever we get a customer case

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed closed this Jun 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1814582. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1814582: [release-4.4] [OCPCLOUD-774] Add Node startup timeout API field

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants