-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSSMDOC-133 Roll back autoscaling options in 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 branches. #27263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is still going to cause confusion, as this option and the next are defined under
collector/options
, e.g.whereas the
replicas
field is:I think we need two tables - one for the parameters that are used by the operator (or k8s), and the other for the options that are passed to the component (collector in this case).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's see if I've got the distinction clear before I start movings things around into new tables.
And is there somewhere where all this is written down? I've been trying to piece things together from various example files in the Jaeger Operator repo, but a definitive list would be really useful. The CLI flags (https://www.jaegertracing.io/docs/1.21/cli/#jaeger-collector-elasticsearch) don't really help in figuring out where the options would be nested in the configuration files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct, you have the distinction clear.
The CLI flags only appear in the component/options section (i.e. the second category), passed to the component.
Unfortunately the other types are not generated into easily understandable docs yet - there are some godocs: https://godoc.org/github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/pkg/apis/jaegertracing/v1
So for these, probably the examples are a good source still.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, that is actually very helpful. And thanks for the link to the godocs, I hadn't seen those before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@objectiser , this is somewhat of a stale PR. I'm creating a new issue to deal with splitting the table format so that
1 - we can move forward with removing this content from these branches and
2 - the tables get updated in the current and future branches.
JIRA is OSSMDOC-233.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @jpkrohling