Adjusted guidance around cluster maximums #32936
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/M
|
✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready! 🔨 Explore the source changes: bd9d0e9 🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/60b69c1ab5662c0008120e0c 😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-32936--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/planning-your-environment-according-to-object-maximums |
ahardin-rh
added
the
peer-review-needed
| influence the stated thresholds, including the etcd version or storage data | ||
| format. | ||
| These guidelines are based on the largest possible cluster. For smaller clusters, the maximums are lower. There are many factors that | ||
| influence the stated thresholds, including the etcd version or storage data format. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
did you intend to unwrap this line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, but looks like there's an extra space that's throwing off the flow; fixing that now! Thanks!
ahardin-rh
added
peer-review-done
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.8 |
|
@ahardin-rh: new pull request created: #32979 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Relates to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/PERFSCALE-868
Preview build: https://deploy-preview-32936--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/planning-your-environment-according-to-object-maximums?utm_source=github&utm_campaign=bot_dp