-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSDOCS#6278: Release note for Nutanix three-node cluster #62852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/21069 |
@sgaoshang Release note for Nutanix three-node cluster support is ready for QE review. PTAL. |
/lgtm |
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
|
||
[id="ocp-4-14-nutanix-three-node"] | ||
==== Three-node cluster support for Nutanix | ||
With {product-title} {product-version}, deploying a three-node cluster is supported on Nutanix. This type of {product-title} cluster is a smaller, more resource efficient cluster, as it consists of only three control plane machines, which also act as compute machines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The second sentence seems a little long for minimalism purposes, and I'm not sure if "as it" will work well in translation. Suggested rewrite below, but only use if it resonates with you. Not a deal-breaker. LGTM once you resolve the merge conflict. @ousleyp - any additional feedback?
Deploying a three-node cluster is supported on Nutanix as of {product-title} {product-version}. This type of {product-title} cluster is more resource-efficient because the three control plane machines also act as compute machines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, I agree with Sabrina's review. Otherwise LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sabrinajess Thanks for the suggestions. I modified slightly but retained most of the original language as this is the language PM wanted to use when we shipped three-node support for other providers in earlier releases.
a27c0ea
to
13924d4
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
13924d4
to
156e12c
Compare
Version(s):
4.14
Issue:
This PR addresses osdocs-6278.
Link to docs preview:
Three-node cluster support for Nutanix
QE review: