Skip to content

MIG-1449: Release notes catch-up for 4.11 #65848

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

MIG-1449: Release notes catch-up for 4.11 #65848

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor

@anarnold97 anarnold97 commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited
Loading

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 5, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anarnold97 anarnold97 changed the title MIG-1449: Release notes catch-up MIG-1449: Release notes catch-up for 4.11 Oct 5, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 5, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://65848--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/27027

@anarnold97 anarnold97 force-pushed the MIG-1449-release-notes branch from 3b8376b to 40e365c Compare October 5, 2023 21:45
@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label mtc

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the MTC Label for all MTC PRs label Oct 5, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

Fixing error for 4.11 merge see comment for details

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 5, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

@bscott-rh bscott-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 6, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 6, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 6, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

bscott-rh
bscott-rh reviewed Oct 6, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@bscott-rh bscott-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a few nits and minor comments.

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bscott-rh - good spots. I will need a couple of hours to get back to this. I will have to update the complete set for 4.12, 4.13, 4.14 as well as so it is going to take about an hour, but I am on it.

It might be easier to make a new PR for those version and copy you in, if that is ok with you, please

@bscott-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@bscott-rh - good spots. I will need a couple of hours to get back to this. I will have to update the complete set for 4.12, 4.13, 4.14 as well as so it is going to take about an hour, but I am on it.

It might be easier to make a new PR for those version and copy you in, if that is ok with you, please

No problem, I'll review those PRs whenever you've got them. I think that would be necessary anyways because this PR is 4.11 only. Thanks

@anarnold97 anarnold97 force-pushed the MIG-1449-release-notes branch from e122ad8 to 7ce6a85 Compare October 6, 2023 16:15
@bscott-rh bscott-rh removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 9, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2023 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1449 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

MIG-1449

Merge failed to Enterprise 4.11 → branch/enterprise-4.11

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

MTC release notes

QE review:

  • [ X] QE has approved this change. - Reviewed by Rayford Johnson

Additional information:

@bscott-rh
Copy link
Contributor

No additional peer review was conducted because this was a cherrypick. Merge review LGTM.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh merged commit cc41b04 into openshift:enterprise-4.11 Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bscott-rh bscott-rh bscott-rh left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. MTC Label for all MTC PRs size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@anarnold97 @openshift-ci-robot @ocpdocs-previewbot @bscott-rh