-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
[OSDOCS-8167]: Release note about operators that aren't tested for hosted control planes #67216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OSDOCS-8167]: Release note about operators that aren't tested for hosted control planes #67216
Conversation
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/32456 |
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines | ||
** Node Feature Discovery Operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can remove this, the Jira needs updates but based on recent testing this is working on BM: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MGMT-14668
Otherwise, LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed. Thanks, Adel!
efb65ae
to
9eea264
Compare
/lgtm |
/label peer-review-needed |
/label peer-review-in-progress |
Hi @lahinson, one comment, but otherwise LGTM! |
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
/lgtm |
/label merge-review-needed |
Looks like this PR will need change management. FYI @JoeAldinger |
Thanks @opayne1! I'll start this through the change management process. |
Ok to merge the current list, if there are more other known issues, operators not tested, we can update in a separate PR. |
|
||
* Broadcom network interface controllers in legacy Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) do not support quality of service (QoS) and tag protocol identifier (TPID) settings for the SRIOV VLAN. This affects Broadcom BCM57414, Broadcom BCM57508, and Broadcom BCM57504. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-9881[*RHEL-9881*]) | ||
|
||
* In hosted control planes for {product-title}, the following operators and components are not tested (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-605[*OCPSTRAT-605*]): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* In hosted control planes for {product-title}, the following operators and components are not tested (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-605[*OCPSTRAT-605*]): | |
* In hosted control planes for {product-title}, the following Operators and components are not tested (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-605[*OCPSTRAT-605*]): |
9eea264
to
62e0c41
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/label peer-review-needed |
/label peer-review-in-progress |
LGTM I am new on the peer review squad. Please wait until @abhatt-rh gives my review the go-ahead |
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @lahinson. I added a couple of comments related to using common attributes that are available for product names and suggestion about the use of Performance Addon Operator (PAO).
|
||
** Performance Addon Operator | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift sandboxed containers | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | |
** {gitops-title} |
** Performance Addon Operator | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift sandboxed containers | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
** Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh | |
** {SMProductName} |
** Red Hat OpenShift sandboxed containers | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
** Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines | |
** {pipelines-title} |
** Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
** Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | |
** {openshift-dev-spaces-productname} |
* In hosted control planes for {product-title}, the following Operators and components are not tested (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-605[*OCPSTRAT-605*]): | ||
|
||
** Performance Addon Operator | ||
** Red Hat OpenShift sandboxed containers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's an attribute for this too: {sandboxed-containers-first}.
However, it resolves in OpenShift sandboxed containers and not Red Hat OpenShift sandboxed containers
|
||
* In hosted control planes for {product-title}, the following Operators and components are not tested (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-605[*OCPSTRAT-605*]): | ||
|
||
** Performance Addon Operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider verifying with the SME if this should be Node Tuning Operator (NTO) instead of the Performance Addon Operator (PAO) since in OCP 4.11, PAO functions moved to NTO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question, @abhatt-rh. This reference to Performance Add Operator is correct -- it should not be changed to NTO.
…sted control planes
62e0c41
to
de0ba8e
Compare
Thanks for your review, @abhatt-rh! I replaced the hard-coded names with the attributes that you suggested. I'll move this along to merge review. |
/label merge-review-needed |
/label merge-review-in-progress |
Version(s): 4.14z
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-8167
Link to docs preview: https://67216--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-14-release-notes#ocp-4-14-known-issues (Ctrl+F to "OCPSTRAT-605")
QE review:
Additional information: I am following the change management guidelines to add this known issue in between releases.