OCPBUGS#44672: 4.14 Added IPsec enabled node known issue to RNs

[dfitzmau]

Note: CM WILL BE SENT AFTER SME ACK.

Note: In error I used the engineering Jira number to represent the feature branch name. This number will not interfere with engineering PRs. OCPBUGS-44672 is the correct docs Jira for this issue.

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
OCPBUGS-44672

Link to docs preview:

• Known issues

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44672, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44672 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
OCPBUGS-44672

Link to docs preview:

• Known issues

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@dfitzmau: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14

Issue:
OCPBUGS-44672

Link to docs preview:

• Known issues

• SME has approved this change.
• QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Mon Nov 18 16:47:34 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://85079--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-14-release-notes.html

[openshift-ci]

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[zshi-redhat]

LGTM

[stevsmit]

This LGTM, but it looks like it will require CM based on this bullet point from the manual:

Adding or removing known or fixed issues in between releases (including z stream releases) to the release notes. Sometimes, a known issue might be missed by the documentation team for a z-stream because confirmation from an engineer on a private bug was not resolved; retrospective addition of this known issue after a z-stream release would require a CM.

[dfitzmau]

This LGTM, but it looks like it will require CM based on this bullet point from the manual:

Adding or removing known or fixed issues in between releases (including z stream releases) to the release notes. Sometimes, a known issue might be missed by the documentation team for a z-stream because confirmation from an engineer on a private bug was not resolved; retrospective addition of this known issue after a z-stream release would require a CM.

Thanks, @stevsmit . Yes, a CM is planned. I'm waiting on the engineer to approve the text before I sent the CM as people want to review the polished text before it is merged. I'll add a note to the description section.

[trozet]

/lgtm

[huiran0826]

/lgtm