-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
RHDEVDOCS-6270: Release notes PR for GitOps 1.14.2 z-stream release #85102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RHDEVDOCS-6270: Release notes PR for GitOps 1.14.2 z-stream release #85102
Conversation
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
🤖 Fri Nov 22 05:59:59 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
a9961f9
to
fd50d30
Compare
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@Dhruv-Soni11 , the 1.14.2 RN entry for 5788 looks good. "Before this update, the New App panel behaved unexpectedly as it reopened immediately after being closed, and typing in fields causes the cursor and text to flash repeatedly. With this fix, the New App panel operates as intended. GITOPS-5788" One question I have is whether to reference 5788 or 5671? There were duplicates opened in Jira. |
@keithchong - I don't know the answer to this question so I request @ishitasequeira to help us regarding this. |
As we marked https://issues.redhat.com/browse/GITOPS-5788 as a dupe. Please refer https://issues.redhat.com/browse/GITOPS-5671 |
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
62bc548
to
86ee1d7
Compare
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
86ee1d7
to
07ed8fd
Compare
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
07ed8fd
to
b0f7a7d
Compare
LGTM, thanks |
b0f7a7d
to
0b8f093
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/LGTM
/label merge-review-needed |
/label merge-review-in-progress |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR has 2 commits, which need to be squashed before it can be merged.
Also, can you please fix the one other comment while you're doing that? Thanks!
0b8f093
to
3ebfe9f
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Implementing SME review comments
3ebfe9f
to
b70e775
Compare
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6270 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@Dhruv-Soni11: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Hi @bergerhoffer I have incorporated the feedback for your comment and squashed the extra commit. PTAL and merge the PR if everything looks fine. |
/label merge-review-needed |
Version(s):
GitOps 1.14
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-6270
Link to docs preview:
Release Notes for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.14.2
QE review:
SME review: @ishitasequeira @keithchong
Peer review: @skrthomas
QE review: @varshab1210
Additional information: