Skip to content

Conversation

shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor

@shivanisathe25 shivanisathe25 commented Nov 19, 2024

Version(s) to cherry-pick: build-docs-1.2

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-6206

Link to docs preview: https://85106--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-builds/latest/work_with_builds/using-builds.html

SME review: @apoorvajagtap

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 19, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 19, 2024

@shivanisathe25 shivanisathe25 changed the title Network restricted env RHDEVDOCS-6206: Builds for OpenShift: Disconnected Install Instructions Nov 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 19, 2024

@shivanisathe25: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6206 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 19, 2024

@shivanisathe25: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6206 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) to cherry-pick: build-docs-1.1

Issue:

Link to docs preview: https://85106--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-builds/latest/work_with_builds/using-builds.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2024

@shivanisathe25: The label(s) /label retest cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@shivanisathe25: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6206 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) to cherry-pick: build-docs-1.1

Issue:

Link to docs preview: https://85106--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-builds/latest/work_with_builds/using-builds.html

SME review: @apoorvajagtap

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Member

@avinal avinal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few changes.

Copy link
Member

@avinal avinal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Nov 22, 2024
@skrthomas skrthomas added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@skrthomas skrthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments for you. Lookin' good :)

@skrthomas skrthomas added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Nov 22, 2024
@shivanisathe25 shivanisathe25 force-pushed the network-restricted-env branch 2 times, most recently from a02a5cf to 7e72262 Compare November 25, 2024 06:38
@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 25, 2024
@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor

opayne1 commented Nov 25, 2024

Hi @shivanisathe25 please squash your commits and then resubmit for merge review. Thank you!

@opayne1 opayne1 removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 25, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2024

@shivanisathe25: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6206 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) to cherry-pick: build-docs-1.2

Issue:

Link to docs preview: https://85106--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-builds/latest/work_with_builds/using-builds.html

SME review: @apoorvajagtap

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 26, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 26, 2024
@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2024

@shivanisathe25: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6206 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) to cherry-pick: build-docs-1.2

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-6206

Link to docs preview: https://85106--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-builds/latest/work_with_builds/using-builds.html

SME review: @apoorvajagtap

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@xenolinux xenolinux added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General comment: Please consider giving files short names. it's best to keep the id and the filename same.

One suggestion about not using xref in a module.

Holding merge for now. Ensure to add the merge-review label again after addressing comments.

@xenolinux xenolinux removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 26, 2024
@shivanisathe25 shivanisathe25 force-pushed the network-restricted-env branch 2 times, most recently from 562444e to 953c685 Compare November 26, 2024 12:37
RHDEVDOCS-6207 Some minor updates
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 26, 2024

@shivanisathe25: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@shivanisathe25
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 26, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 26, 2024

:_mod-docs-content-type: PROCEDURE
[id='ob-creating-buildah-build-in-a-network-restricted-environment_{context}']
= Creating buildah build in a network restricted environment
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be restricted network? I see network restricted environment is used elsewhere in the Builds docs.
If network restricted environment and restricted network are not the same thing, we should at least go with network-restricted environment.
Can be done in a separate PR. Not worth holding up the merge.

@mburke5678 mburke5678 removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 26, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit be8a257 into openshift:build-docs-main Nov 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick build-docs-1.2

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #85505

In response to this:

/cherrypick build-docs-1.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants