Skip to content

Conversation

anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor

@anarnold97 anarnold97 commented Jan 31, 2025

JIRA

image

We have requested the OCP operator lifecycle table is updated

But MTC 1.7 is not supported on OCP 4.17

Version(s):

  • OCP 4.17 → branch/enterprise-4.17
  • OCP 4.18 → branch/enterprise-4.18

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Signed-off-by: A.Arnold <anarnold@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 31, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2025

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1679 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 31, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2025

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1679 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

JIRA

Version(s):

  • OCP 4.17 → branch/enterprise-4.17
  • OCP 4.18 → branch/enterprise-4.18

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Fri Jan 31 14:59:00 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://87904--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2025

@anarnold97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 31, 2025

@anarnold97: This pull request references MIG-1679 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

JIRA

image

We have requested the OCP operator lifecycle table is updated

But MTC 1.7 is not supported on OCP 4.17

Version(s):

  • OCP 4.17 → branch/enterprise-4.17
  • OCP 4.18 → branch/enterprise-4.18

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@anarnold97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label mtc

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the MTC Label for all MTC PRs label Jan 31, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 2, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 1, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jul 2, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. MTC Label for all MTC PRs size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants