Skip to content

Conversation

jldohmann
Copy link
Contributor

@jldohmann jldohmann commented May 1, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 1, 2025

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-14520 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14520

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 1, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 1, 2025

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-14520 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14520

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: verbiage is basically the same as the deprecation notice

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 1, 2025

🤖 Fri May 02 01:52:43 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://92899--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 1, 2025

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-14520 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14520

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: verbiage is basically the same as the deprecation notice

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jldohmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpei could you PTAL for QE ack? this is the release note entry for the removal of support for RHEL worker nodes. the last doc piece for this feature 😄 thank you

@jldohmann jldohmann added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 1, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 2, 2025

@jldohmann: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mletalie mletalie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/lgtm
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels May 2, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 2, 2025
@gpei
Copy link

gpei commented May 6, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented May 6, 2025

@jldohmann: This pull request references OSDOCS-14520 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14520

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: verbiage is basically the same as the deprecation notice

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jldohmann jldohmann merged commit a448048 into openshift:enterprise-4.19 May 6, 2025
2 checks passed
@jldohmann jldohmann deleted the OSDOCS-14520 branch May 6, 2025 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.19 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants