Skip to content

Conversation

brendan-daly-red-hat
Copy link
Contributor

@brendan-daly-red-hat brendan-daly-red-hat commented Jun 12, 2025

Version:
4.19

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14689

Link to docs preview:
Installing a cluster on Google Cloud Platform (GCP) with a user-provisioned DNS (Technology Preview)

QE review:

Additional information:
This feature is TP. The original RN PR (#93403) didn't indicate this status, so this PR is to correct that omission.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 12, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 12, 2025

🤖 Thu Jun 12 15:33:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://94690--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-19-release-notes.html

@brendan-daly-red-hat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 12, 2025
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 12, 2025

With this release, you can enable a user-provisioned domain name server (DNS) instead of the default cluster-provisioned DNS solution. For example, your organization's security policies might not allow the use of public DNS services such as Google Cloud DNS. You can manage your DNS only for the IP addresses of the API and Ingress servers. If you use this feature, you must provide your own DNS solution that includes records for `api.<cluster_name>.<base_domain>.` and `*.apps.<cluster_name>.<base_domain>.`.
With this release, you can enable a user-provisioned domain name server (DNS) as a Technology Preview feature instead of the default cluster-provisioned DNS solution. For example, your organization's security policies might not allow the use of public DNS services such as Google Cloud DNS. You can manage your DNS only for the IP addresses of the API and Ingress servers. If you use this feature, you must provide your own DNS solution that includes records for `api.<cluster_name>.<base_domain>.` and `*.apps.<cluster_name>.<base_domain>.`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's okay, but I don't love the placement of this addition. It kind of interrupts the flow of the sentence. When I come across that with mine, I usually just add a sentence like " is available as a Technology Preview feature" or something similar.

If you search the RNs for "as a Technology Preview", you'll find some examples. Just something to consider!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this sentence at the end: "Enabling a user-provisioned DNS is available as a Technology Preview feature."

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jun 12, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 12, 2025

@brendan-daly-red-hat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@brendan-daly-red-hat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 12, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit e095edf into openshift:enterprise-4.19 Jun 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.19 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants