Skip to content

Conversation

abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor

@abrennan89 abrennan89 commented Aug 25, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Aug 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 25, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 25, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 25, 2025

🤖 Tue Sep 02 14:46:15 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://98007--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 25, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:
https://98007--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-kueue/latest/welcome/supported-environments.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 25, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 28, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:
TBA

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Aug 28, 2025
@abrennan89 abrennan89 added kueue-docs Merge to main Kueue docs branch kueue-docs-1.1 Merge to Kueue 1.1 docs release branch labels Aug 28, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 28, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@SNiemann15
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 2, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@abrennan89: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@anahas-redhat
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 4, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-14172 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):

  • kueue-docs
  • kueue-docs-1.1

Issue:

Fixes the following issues

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 5, 2025
@abrennan89 abrennan89 merged commit 93dd04e into openshift:kueue-docs Sep 5, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. kueue-docs Merge to main Kueue docs branch kueue-docs-1.1 Merge to Kueue 1.1 docs release branch lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-merge size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants