OPRUN-4194: Upgrade index to use 4.21

[camilamacedo86]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@camilamacedo86: This pull request references OPRUN-4194 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[camilamacedo86]

/hold

We need to run the tests first: openshift/release#70215

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[camilamacedo86]

test manually:

$ make test-catalog
go build -mod=vendor -o /Users/camilam/go/src/github/operator-framework-operator-controller/openshift/default-catalog-consistency/bin/ginkgo ./vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/ginkgo
/Users/camilam/go/src/github/operator-framework-operator-controller/openshift/default-catalog-consistency/bin/ginkgo  \
		--junit-report=junit_olm.xml ./test/validate/...
2025/10/13 14:23:20 maxprocs: Leaving GOMAXPROCS=11: CPU quota undefined
Running Suite: OLM-Catalog-Validation - /Users/camilam/go/src/github/operator-framework-operator-controller/openshift/default-catalog-consistency/test/validate
===============================================================================================================================================================
Random Seed: 1760361800

Will run 8 of 8 specs
••••no default policy found for (registry.redhat.io/redhat/certified-operator-index:v4.21), using insecure policy 
•no default policy found for (registry.redhat.io/redhat/community-operator-index:v4.21), using insecure policy 
•no default policy found for (registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-marketplace-index:v4.21), using insecure policy 
•no default policy found for (registry.redhat.io/redhat/redhat-operator-index:v4.21), using insecure policy 
•

Ran 8 of 8 Specs in 89.820 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 8 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
PASS

Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 1m50.176521792s
Test Suite Passed

[tmshort]

Actually... this is a change outside of the openshift directory... it needs to be done upstream. I will come up with something that allows this change to be made downstream however... let me do that upstream.
/hold

[tmshort]

See: operator-framework/operator-controller#2264

[openshift-ci]

@camilamacedo86: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/openshift-e2e-aws	ae1ba6c	link	true	/test openshift-e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[tmshort]

/close
Closing in favor of #518, once the sync PR is merged (#519).

[openshift-ci]

@tmshort: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
Closing in favor of #518, once the sync PR is merged (#519).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.