fix: NanoTDF secure key from debug logging and iv conflict risk #208
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change is motivated from the CodeQL result: https://github.com/opentdf/java-sdk/security/code-scanning/1 Although that use of a static IV is deliberate, it helped highlight that we should ensure that there is no reuse of the IV when encrypting the data. In addition it was found that there were two places the key was logged, due to the sensitivity of the key this has been removed.
|
pflynn-virtru
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2024
dmihalcik-virtru
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
mkleene
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>0.7.6</summary> ## [0.7.6](v0.7.5...v0.7.6) (2025-02-06) ### Features * Add assertion verification ([#216](#216)) ([e0f8caf](e0f8caf)) * **cmdline:** assertions cli support ([#204](#204)) ([3325114](3325114)) * **sdk:** Add and expose tamper error types ([#187](#187)) ([b4f95e6](b4f95e6)) * **sdk:** adds Collections API ([#212](#212)) ([1ee1367](1ee1367)) ### Bug Fixes * Correct null assertions when deserializing ([#211](#211)) ([b075194](b075194)) * incorrect isStreamable serialized name ([#210](#210)) ([32825b0](32825b0)) * NanoTDF secure key from debug logging and iv conflict risk ([#208](#208)) ([6301d32](6301d32)) * **sdk:** deserialize object statement values correctly ([#219](#219)) ([c513e8c](c513e8c)) * **sdk:** Fuzz testing and protocol fixes ([#214](#214)) ([cf6f932](cf6f932)) * **sdk:** group splits with empty/missing split IDs together ([#217](#217)) ([0f47702](0f47702)) * **sdk:** remove hex encoding ([#213](#213)) ([e076d11](e076d11)) * **sdk:** uses offset for ByteBuffer array offset ([#209](#209)) ([0d6e761](0d6e761)) * Use reusable start-additional-kas workflow ([#215](#215)) ([cb6f757](cb6f757)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change is motivated from the CodeQL result: https://github.com/opentdf/java-sdk/security/code-scanning/1
Although that use of a static IV is deliberate, it helped highlight that we should ensure that there is no reuse of the IV when encrypting the data.
In addition it was found that there were two places the key was logged, due to the sensitivity of the key this has been removed.