Skip to content

Conversation

@strantalis
Copy link
Member

The isStreamable was generating the wrong serialized name in the manifest causing json schema validation to fail.

Before IsStreamable
After isStreamable

@strantalis strantalis requested review from a team as code owners November 10, 2024 01:55
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@strantalis strantalis merged commit 32825b0 into main Nov 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@strantalis strantalis deleted the serialized-name-bug branch November 13, 2024 18:26
mkleene pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>0.7.6</summary>

## [0.7.6](v0.7.5...v0.7.6)
(2025-02-06)


### Features

* Add assertion verification
([#216](#216))
([e0f8caf](e0f8caf))
* **cmdline:** assertions cli support
([#204](#204))
([3325114](3325114))
* **sdk:** Add and expose tamper error types
([#187](#187))
([b4f95e6](b4f95e6))
* **sdk:** adds Collections API
([#212](#212))
([1ee1367](1ee1367))


### Bug Fixes

* Correct null assertions when deserializing
([#211](#211))
([b075194](b075194))
* incorrect isStreamable serialized name
([#210](#210))
([32825b0](32825b0))
* NanoTDF secure key from debug logging and iv conflict risk
([#208](#208))
([6301d32](6301d32))
* **sdk:** deserialize object statement values correctly
([#219](#219))
([c513e8c](c513e8c))
* **sdk:** Fuzz testing and protocol fixes
([#214](#214))
([cf6f932](cf6f932))
* **sdk:** group splits with empty/missing split IDs together
([#217](#217))
([0f47702](0f47702))
* **sdk:** remove hex encoding
([#213](#213))
([e076d11](e076d11))
* **sdk:** uses offset for ByteBuffer array offset
([#209](#209))
([0d6e761](0d6e761))
* Use reusable start-additional-kas workflow
([#215](#215))
([cb6f757](cb6f757))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants