Skip to content

Updated WLST data type compatibility check method to see "class java.… #109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 24, 2018

Conversation

mwooten
Copy link
Contributor

@mwooten mwooten commented May 23, 2018

Fixes issues #107, #108 and #112

…lang.Log" and "<type 'javainstance'>" as being compatible with WLST long
mwooten added 2 commits May 23, 2018 16:53
…nly'" reference variable, during the entire validation process
@@ -108,9 +109,11 @@ def validate_in_standalone_mode(self, model_dict, variables_file_name=None, arch
"""
_method_name = 'validate_in_standalone_mode'

cloned_model_dict = copy.deepcopy(model_dict)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a comment here to describe why its necessary to do a deep copy so someone doesn't accidentally change it back.

@ddsharpe ddsharpe merged commit c836d95 into master May 24, 2018
@ddsharpe ddsharpe deleted the Fix-compatibility-data-typing-for-Python-long branch May 24, 2018 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants