Skip to content

Conversation

simon-meng-cn
Copy link
Contributor

@simon-meng-cn simon-meng-cn commented Jan 7, 2019

Jenkins passed. http://****/job/weblogic-kubernetes-operator-javatest/801/

@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ For information about how to shut down a domain running in Kubernetes, see [Shut

To permanently remove the Kubernetes resources for a domain from a Kubernetes cluster, run the [Delete WebLogic domain resources](/kubernetes/delete-weblogic-domain-resources.sh) script. This script will delete a specific domain, or all domains, and all the Kubernetes resources associated with a set of given domains. The script will also attempt a clean shutdown of a domain’s WebLogic pods before deleting its resources.  You can run the script in a test mode to show what would be shutdown and deleted without actually performing the shutdowns and deletions.   For script help, use its `-h` option.

The script will remove only domain-related resources which are labeled with the `domainUID` label, such as resources created by the [Create WebLogic domain](/kubernetes/create-weblogic-domain.sh) script or the [integration tests](/src/integration-tests/bash/run.sh).  If you manually created resources and have not labelled them with a `domainUID`, the script will not remove them.   One way to label a resource that has already been deployed is:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should remove the references to run.sh from V1.1 doc because run.sh is only removed in V2.0.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A question: why release V1.1 doc in 2.0 source code?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markxnelson @rjeberhard I don't remember the details about this. can you also confirm if my understanding/comments are correct?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 1.1 docs were preserved so you could see the documentation for that release. In general, I agree that we should not change the historical documents.

Copy link

@tbarnes-us tbarnes-us left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Apart from the changes to 1.0/1.1 doc files that Dongbo noticed - I think those should simply be left unchanged.

@rjeberhard rjeberhard merged commit 421aabf into develop Jan 7, 2019
@rjeberhard rjeberhard deleted the OWLS-70486 branch January 9, 2019 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants