📖 Improve the REUSE parts of the License check

[mxmehl]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR contains three changes concerning the REUSE part of the License check:

• Improve a link
• Fix the LICENSES directory name
• Clarify where the tool looks for license text files

The third point needs your review as I am not certain how the tool checks for license files. As the docs also recommend putting license files in LICENSES, this SHOULD be the case.

• PR title follows the guidelines defined in our pull request documentation

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?**

The check documentation and the recommendations are unclear and partly misleading.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

NONE

Special notes for your reviewer

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

[spencerschrock]

Can you run make generate-docs and commit the changes to docs/checks.md?

docs/checks/internal/checks.yaml is the correct place to make changes, but the markdown needs to be generated too.

[mxmehl]

Can you run make generate-docs and commit the changes to docs/checks.md?

docs/checks/internal/checks.yaml is the correct place to make changes, but the markdown needs to be generated too.

Sure, done, sorry for not doing that in the first place.

[spencerschrock]

Can you run make generate-docs and commit the changes to docs/checks.md?
docs/checks/internal/checks.yaml is the correct place to make changes, but the markdown needs to be generated too.

Sure, done, sorry for not doing that in the first place.

Thanks! You'll need to fix your DCO on your last commit and then we can merge. https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/pull/4155/checks?check_run_id=25990600837

[mxmehl]

Thanks! You'll need to fix your DCO on your last commit and then we can merge. #4155 (checks)

Whoops, done, thanks!