-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pose estimation accuracy? #90
Comments
I think that mostly depends on your camera calibration and resolution (and
the quality of the printed marker).
…On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 07:45 Kevinsanity ***@***.***> wrote:
May I ask the accuracy/tolerance of the pose estimation (translation and
rotation) of the ArUco marker? Is it millimeter-level for translation or
bigger? And with rotation?
Thank you very much!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#90>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANEK5FNGVWDFBH64F6FT23SUURXZANCNFSM4UZYZODQ>
.
|
@awesomebytes is right. The size of the squares of the aruco also has a great influence. Moslty is resolution/marker size, higher on any increases detection range and accuracy. |
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
May I ask the accuracy/tolerance of the pose estimation (translation and rotation) of the ArUco marker? Is it millimeter-level for translation or bigger? And with rotation?
Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: