This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Fetch runtime code from storage cache when using proofing backend #9611
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before we fetched the runtime code from the `TrieBackend` and this lead to not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached storage cache.
bkchr
added
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
labels
Aug 23, 2021
I performed some tests, and we moved from an average of ~100tx/block to ~350tx/block using this commit. |
arkpar
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2021
bot merge |
Trying merge. |
Bot will approve on the behalf of @bkchr, since they are a team lead, in an attempt to reach the minimum approval count |
ghost
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2021
ghost
deleted the
bkchr-storage-hash-caching
branch
August 24, 2021 09:54
Wizdave97
pushed a commit
to Wizdave97/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2021
…ritytech#9611) Before we fetched the runtime code from the `TrieBackend` and this lead to not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached storage cache.
crystalin
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2021
…ritytech#9611) Before we fetched the runtime code from the `TrieBackend` and this lead to not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached storage cache.
JoshOrndorff
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2021
…ritytech#9611) Before we fetched the runtime code from the `TrieBackend` and this lead to not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached storage cache. (cherry picked from commit b79e2b9)
JoshOrndorff
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/substrate
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
…ritytech#9611) Before we fetched the runtime code from the `TrieBackend` and this lead to not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached storage cache. (cherry picked from commit b79e2b9)
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D3-trivial 🧸
PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before we fetched the runtime code from the
TrieBackend
and this leadto not using the storage cache. Thus, we recalculated the storage hash
for the runtime code on every call into the runtime and this killed the
performance on parachains block authoring. The solution is to fetch the
runtime code from the storage cache, to make sure we use the cached
storage cache.