Repository navigation
Changelog and Versioning
The subject's version history and the mechanics of versioning a repository that has no git tags and no releases: versions live in CHANGELOG.md and commit messages, pinning means commit SHAs, and every release entry doubles as a verification report. Compiled from the changelog and git history at 7e17a11 (8 commits, all dated 2026-10-14), with the claims cross-checked against this run's tests where testable.
- How versioning works here
- Commit timeline
- 1.0.0 — initial public release
- 1.0.1 / 1.0.2 — publication readiness
- 1.1.0 — field-report hardening (P0)
- 1.2.0 — the remaining field items (P1-4 … P2-11)
- 1.2.1 — restore the runnable gate, stop templates banning themselves
- Versioning guidance for kit-built wikis
- See also
| Property | State at 7e17a11
|
Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Git tags |
0 (verified: git tag empty; repo_scan.py brief prints "NO TAGS: versioning is by file marker") |
no git checkout v1.2.1; pin by SHA |
| GitHub releases | none | no release assets; the repository clone is the distribution |
| Version record |
CHANGELOG.md (1.0.0 → 1.2.1) + conventional-commit-style messages (feat:, fix:) |
the changelog is the authoritative timeline |
| Per-file version markers | none in tool code (the scan's version-marker sweep finds markers in examples quoting other projects) | cite SHAs, not file versions |
| Commit history | 8 commits, 4 fix / 2 feat / 2 other, all 2026-10-14 | a young, intensively iterated repository |
For a wiki run this shape is a documented fact, not a gap to paper over: the footer's trust line pins to a commit SHA ("verified against the source at commit 7e17a11"), which is stronger than a version label that no tag enforces.
| SHA | Message (abridged) |
|---|---|
cf0be53 |
Initial commit |
b60bb84 |
feat: github-wiki-llm-writer 1.0.0 |
db9c2e5 |
fix: 1.0.1 — publication-readiness fixes (ban loader, CI coverage, docs, publish flow) |
44f68f8 |
fix: make examples/research/facts.json valid JSON; add PUBLISHING.md; widen CI JSON check |
493b0d6 |
Merge github-wiki-llm-writer 1.0.1 into the repository |
92f1ce5 |
fix: 1.0.2 — make the --ban/--terms and documented-paths CI steps actually runnable |
f9030ee |
feat: 1.2.1 — new tools into CI, restore the runnable gate, stop templates banning their own keys |
7e17a11 |
fix: make lib/evidence.py self-test platform-independent |
Extracted from the completed MD.Viewer run (22 files, 73,013 words, 0 QA errors). Shipped: SKILL.md (agent entry point), AGENTS.md (phase→tool map), PROMPT.md (paste-ready prompt), bootstrap.sh, PITFALLS.md, repo_scan.py, req.py, serve.py, webapp_probe.py, qa_wiki.py, new_page.py, publish.sh, templates, examples, and the CI workflow.
The release notes record nine defects found in the tools during extraction — all caught by running them, not reading them, which is the kit's thesis applied to itself:
- the auditor compared every page against the previous page's text (a tuple-assignment bug — 235 phantom errors);
- code-block bodies were never accumulated, so mermaid/shell checks ran vacuously;
- the bracket-in-label check fired on quoted labels and the mermaid cylinder shape;
-
subgraph/endbalancing was applied to sequence diagrams, whereendcloses other blocks; - an over-strict lead-paragraph regex produced false warnings;
- scaffold templates hardcoded page names in
_Footer.md/Home.md— site-wide dead links for any other page list; -
publish.shbroke on a relative wiki dir after its internalcd; - an interactive
readprompt aborted in terminal-less sandboxes, and a filename heuristic blocked legitimate hyphenated titles; - two over-broad avoid-patterns fired on correct prose.
It also records three corrections the Phase-4 re-run found in the delivered wiki: a fabricated code quote replaced with verbatim source; a normaliser documented as path-only that also rewrites query strings (verified by request); and a README-transcribed force-flag propagation claim the code did not implement.
1.0.1: ban-loader fixes, CI coverage, docs and publish-flow corrections; PUBLISHING.md added (the unrelated-histories merge and the .gitignore lib/ trap); the shipped examples/research/facts.json — described in four docs as the machine-readable fact base — turned out to be a Markdown document with a fenced JSON block inside, so the CI JSON check widened to every tracked .json. PITFALLS was recounted and reordered (B8 moved back into group B). 1.0.2 made the --ban/--terms and documented-paths CI steps actually runnable (they had been asserting nothing).
Trigger: an independent field report from a full run against MD.Scribe 3.1.0 (23 pages, 41,623 words, 0 QA errors, 249 empirical checks, 14 verified doc-vs-code discrepancies). Landed:
| Item | What shipped |
|---|---|
| P0-1 |
qa/fix_toc.py — block-scoped TOC rebuilder with the accident fixture as its self-test (8/8) |
| P0-2 |
lib/session.py — cookie-jar client + csrf_from_html; live self-test 8/8 on PHP 8.2.34 |
| P0-3 |
setup/snapshot.sh + templates/REWORK-STATE.md.tmpl
|
| §E | PITFALLS grew by five traps (B9–B11, C8, D8) to 31 total |
| Docs | all four new files listed in the README/SKILL/AGENTS tool tables |
Completed the plan in REWORK-PLAN.md (kept in the tree as the specification and evidence trail). Headline: P1-5, the highest-value fix — a field run had produced 10 QA errors and zero real problems (a ban phrase inside a negation, a refuted quote, a verbatim 404 string, an anchor slug, a probe filename, two domain terms). The auditor now matches on a scrubbed view (code, links, anchors, filenames blanked, offsets preserved), downgrades negated ban hits to warnings (never suppresses), and supports exemptions/fluff_exemptions reported as INFO. The self-test grew from 15 to 22 detections — verified 22/22 in this run (T1).
Also landed: setup/check_runtime.py + bootstrap.sh --subject/--with-composer (P1-4; reproduced exactly in this run, T12); sidebar grouping via --groups/--progress (P1-6, verified 0 QA errors across four paths); publish.sh writing PUBLISH.md instead of only printing (P1-7 — "stdout is gone after a context loss, a file is not"); qa/verify_commands.py (P2-8, scored 19/19 in its originating run and caught real manifest drift); the multi-layout/stateful-probing section of AGENTS.md (P2-9); examples/run2-mdscribe/ (P2-10); lib/evidence.py (P2-11, self-test 3/3 — T3).
Two intertwined regressions, both now covered by checks verified to fail when the defect is reintroduced:
- The
--ban/--termsCI step had become vacuous: its banned fixture phrase sat inside inline code, which the new scrubbing (correctly) blanks — so the command that must fail exited 0. The step now asserts both halves: a prose phrase fires, an inline-code phrase stays silent, and an all-meta ban file warns. -
templates/ban.jsonbanned its own structural keys: the loader treatedexemptions/fluff_exemptionsas phrases, so any wiki explaining those features gotbanned claim 'exemptions'with a raw list as the reason — the same defect class as 1.0.1's_commentbug, one level out. Values are now phrases only when the key is neither_-prefixed, nor structural, nor a list. - Restored: the
.gitignorelib/fix lost in a merge; the documented-paths step split sogrep's exit-1-on-no-match underpipefailcannot abort it; six tools (fix_toc, session, evidence, verify_commands, check_runtime, snapshot) added to CI after shipping documented-but-unexercised. - Added: the workspace-refusal CI step +
.gitignorepatterns (v3.*/,uploads/,incoming/,workspace-fallback/) after a 184-file / 4.4 MB run workspace sat onegit add -Afrom being published. - Fixed:
evidence.py --self-testused/proc/definitely-not-writable, which resolves to a creatableC:\proc\…on Windows — the self-test failed for every Windows user while CI (ubuntu) stayed green; the fixture is now a path whose parent is a regular file, unwritable everywhere (this is the7e17a11commit).
The release's "Verified" section is itself a model: all eleven steps re-run on a real host under three shells, with five named negative controls each proven to make their step fail.
- Pin the wiki's trust line to the subject's commit SHA (the scaffold's
_Footer.mdslot) — not to a version label. - Document the subject's versioning as it is: if the scan reports zero tags, say versioning is changelog-driven; if per-file markers carry versions (the reference subject had eleven), tabulate them.
- When the subject later tags releases, that changes the Changelog page's contract — re-run the scan;
repo_scan.pyprints tag counts precisely so this fact is never guessed.
- Features and Verification Model — the doctrine each release hardened
- QA and Audit Guide — the auditor whose history drives much of this page
- Extending the Kit — the contribution shape the changelog models
-
Tool Reference — current flags and behaviour at
7e17a11 - Home — wiki entry point
github-wiki-llm-writer 1.2.1 · MIT · Repository · Report an issue · Home · Glossary · FAQ · Troubleshooting
Facts in this wiki are verified against the source at commit 7e17a11; see Changelog and Versioning.
Home Getting Started Features and Verification Model Comparison with Alternatives
Installation and Setup Configuration Reference
The Four Phase Workflow Research and Probing Guide Writing Pages Guide QA and Audit Guide
Publishing and Delivery Security Considerations Sandbox Survival Guide Extending the Kit
Tool Reference Architecture Troubleshooting FAQ Changelog and Versioning Glossary
1.2.1 · MIT