Skip to content

Add support for CHECK Constraints #200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

aroralakshya
Copy link

@aroralakshya aroralakshya commented Jul 18, 2018

Add support for CHECK Constraints
#167
Signed-Off-By: Lakshay arora arora.lakshya123@gmail.com

Signed-Off-By: Lakshay arora <arora.lakshya123@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #200 into master will decrease coverage by 2.53%.
The diff coverage is 5.3%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #200      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     99.77%   97.23%   -2.54%     
+ Complexity     1841     1794      -47     
============================================
  Files            61       58       -3     
  Lines          4388     4234     -154     
============================================
- Hits           4378     4117     -261     
- Misses           10      117     +107

@aroralakshya aroralakshya force-pushed the check_constraints branch 2 times, most recently from a52cdbd to f6946f7 Compare August 3, 2018 17:40
Signed-Off-By: Lakshay arora <arora.lakshya123@gmail.com>
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 2, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Oct 2, 2018
@devenbansod
Copy link
Member

Hi @nulll-pointer thanks for the PR. Could you please fix the breaking test?

And also, please add tests to cover this new syntax.

Copy link
Member

@devenbansod devenbansod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nulll-pointer I left a few comments.

/**
* The operands in this component.
*
* @var operands
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be @var array? Not sure what @var operands would mean here.

*
* @var logicalOperatorsArray
*/
public $logicalOperators;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We seem to be using _ to separate out words in variables (and not use camelCase). Can you please change that.

@williamdes
Copy link
Member

@nulll-pointer Can you please update the PR ?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 1, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Mar 1, 2019
*
* @var OperatorsArray
*/
public static $operatorsArray = array("=", ">", "<", "<=", ">=", "!=", "LIKE", "NOT", "BETWEEN", "IS", "NULL", "REGEXP", "REGEXP");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

REGEXP duplicated value in array

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Mar 5, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 4, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label May 4, 2019
@williamdes williamdes self-assigned this May 4, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label May 4, 2019
@williamdes williamdes removed their assignment May 4, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 3, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jul 3, 2019
@williamdes williamdes changed the base branch from master to QA July 3, 2019 14:42
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Jul 3, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 1, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@williamdes
Copy link
Member

I do not like to have to close this PR, but I have to.
Needs more unit tests and to be done onto QA

@williamdes williamdes closed this Oct 28, 2019
@williamdes
Copy link
Member

But still, thank you @aroralakshya !

@williamdes williamdes self-assigned this Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants