-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Fix internal link error of #1506 #1507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Alright, offending line in build from #1506 (comment) is gone now. |
To really understand the way Git does branching, we need to take a step back and examine how Git stores its data. | ||
|
||
As you may remember from <<ch01-getting-started#_what_is_git>>, Git doesn't store data as a series of changesets or differences, but instead as a series of _snapshots_. | ||
As you may remember from <<ch01-getting-started#section__what_is_git>>, Git doesn't store data as a series of changesets or differences, but instead as a series of _snapshots_. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I meant to use 2 underscores to distinguish the 'type' from the 'identifier'.
But good catch with the other ID; I'll change it to be consistent (but then without a leading underscore); i.e. what_is_git_section
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jnavila what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not purist, but just being consistent is great.
Everybody happy here? I'm ready to merge. |
Thanks all for the help |
Implementation of #1506 (comment)