Skip to content

Conversation

ianbollinger
Copy link
Contributor

Type holes will be highlighted using the ".invalid .illegal" style.

@nwolverson
Copy link
Contributor

I think this should be typed holes - a type hole sounds to me like a hole in a type, which is rather what type wildcards are.

is .invalid.illegal correct? It seems the style for that may be a little overbearing, and this is valid syntax. Though I don't have a better suggestion

@ianbollinger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps we could use the .entity.name.function style, since it doesn't yet appear inside function bodies?

@nwolverson
Copy link
Contributor

I think that could work

Type holes will be highlighted using the ".invalid .illegal" style.
This changes the scope for typed holes from
`invalid.illegal.typed-hole` to `entity.name.function.typed-hole`.
@nwolverson nwolverson merged commit 7148914 into purescript-contrib:master Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants