fixed wrong type signature

[amerocu]

No description provided.

[hdgarrood]

Thanks!

[bernhard-herzog]

ISTM that this original type was correct. Before this change, the example in question read:

-- Create an alias for a complex function type
type Baz = Number -> Number -> Bar Number

-- This function will take two arguments and return a record with double the value
mkDoubledFoo :: Baz
mkDoubledFoo foo bar = { foo: 2.0*foo, bar: 2.0*bar }

Baz is defined as a type alias immediately before mkDoubledFoo and is the correct type for that function (Bar is defined earlier in a part I didn't quote here). With this pull request the type becomes Number -> Number -> Baz which is clearly wrong.

[hdgarrood]

🤦‍♂️ thank you. If someone wants to put a PR together reverting the change I’d appreciate it!

[bernhard-herzog]

I'll prepare one