Skip to content

use pypy4 in travis CI #420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2016
Merged

use pypy4 in travis CI #420

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2016

Conversation

reaperhulk
Copy link
Member

refs #410 and #419

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 87.72%

Merging #420 into master will not affect coverage as of 7f6e3e0

@@            master    #420   diff @@
======================================
  Files            7       7       
  Stmts         2045    2045       
  Branches       377     377       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit           1794    1794       
  Partial        121     121       
  Missed         130     130

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 7f6e3e0

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@hynek
Copy link
Contributor

hynek commented Feb 3, 2016

OMG Paul you're literally the best!

Only one wish (but I guess I can do it myself): the PyPy envs can be removed from failure allowed.

@hynek
Copy link
Contributor

hynek commented Feb 3, 2016

Thank you so much. <3

hynek added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2016
@hynek
Merge pull request #420 from reaperhulk/pypy4
4304888 
use pypy4 in travis CI
@hynek hynek merged commit 4304888 into pyca:master Feb 7, 2016
@hynek
Copy link
Contributor

hynek commented Feb 7, 2016

ugh my phone didn’t merge it back then oO

@reaperhulk reaperhulk deleted the pypy4 branch March 11, 2016 13:48
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 20, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@reaperhulk @codecov-io @hynek