Skip to content

Conversation

azure-pipelines[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 495

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.374%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 491: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 445
Relevant Lines: 457

💛 - Coveralls

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 495

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.374%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 491: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 445
Relevant Lines: 457

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Nov 19, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 497

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.374%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 491: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 445
Relevant Lines: 457

💛 - Coveralls

@penguinolog penguinolog merged commit 5d532be into master Nov 19, 2018
@penguinolog penguinolog deleted the azure-pipelines branch November 19, 2018 10:55
penguinolog added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2018
* Update pyproject.toml
* Extra cythonize internals
* bind_args_kwargs return list and use less memory
* Extra cythonize: _repr_iterable_items
* BoundParameter: subclass inspect.Parameter
* Set up CI with Azure Pipelines (#65)
* Update README.rst
* Fix azure CI status badge
* Moved from private
* Azure pipelines: build x64 and x86, use template (#68)
* Pylint is precondition on Azure side

* fix hidden errors: some cython code replaced by correct python
* unify API
* temporary: do not cythonize on windows: looks like cython bug

Signed-off-by: Alexey Stepanov <penguinolog@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants