Address feedback from initial review of application flow

[ewdurbin]

• Eliminate “New” display on the benefits selection form
• Only show the “At Capacity” once anything has reached capacity!
• Format $ as commas and USD.
• Note: Highlighting for all benefits in a package has some kind of bug. Reproduce: Select “visionary” and look at “Language Summit recognition”
• Confirmation list of selected benefits on the Sponsor Application page could use formatting/bullets
• Add hover over pop up to display ‘benefit description’ field from python.org/admin/sponsors/sponsorshipbenefit/
• Update copy across benefit selection, sponsor form, and submission confirmation
• Add a CMS editable box for top of benefits selection form
• Allow a group access for sponsorship preview/soft-launch

[berinhard]

Hm, I didn't get why we have to filter the benefits_qs by program to check if there's one of them without available capacity. Can't we refactor the code to:

Suggested change

	capacities_met = any(
	[
	any([not b.has_capacity for b in benefits_qs.filter(program=p)])
	for p in programs
	]
	)
	capacities_met = all([b.has_capacity for b in benefits_qs])

[ewdurbin]

I did this primarily since I anticipate that at some point we will have programs that are no longer active. a bit premature.

[berinhard]

@ewdurbin I updated this PR fixing the remaining 2 items (benefit description + selection highlight bug). Feel free to review, test and merge this PR if nothing else pops up. I'm attaching 2 screen shots as quick demos:

benefit description

all benefits are now highlighted

[JackieAugustine]

benefit description + selection highlight bug has reappeared. Explanation: when selecting a package some 'benefits' do not highlight in blue'

[ewdurbin]

@JackieAugustine thanks, but this is probably related to #1687, not this Pull Request.

[ewdurbin]

@JackieAugustine fix for that is introduced in #1688