-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Add repo-specific scale config files #127566
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/127566
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Active SEVsThere are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below: ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 5310478 with merge base 18a3f78 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
@pytorchbot merge -f "lint passed. Other jobs are irrelevant" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: Approvers from one of the following sets are needed:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I guess we have decided to keep the scale config here?
At least for now. This is how the pre-existing code expects per-repo level runners to be configured. A config in test-infra is expected for org-wide runners |
@pytorchbot merge -f "lint passed. Other jobs are irrelevant" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
…127578) Initial set of runners added in #127566 seem to be working. Expanding to include more machine types, especially GPU machines Pull Request resolved: #127578 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
Part of moving pytorch/pytorch CI infra to a Linux foundation run AWS account. For self-hosted runners that can run jobs from just a single repo, the runner scalers expect them to be stored in the repo itself. These scale-config files define how the linux foundation's self-hosted runners are configured. These will apply to runners that only are available to the pytorch/pytorch and pytorch/pytorch-canary repos Pull Request resolved: pytorch#127566 Approved by: https://github.com/zxiiro, https://github.com/huydhn, https://github.com/atalman
…ytorch#127578) Initial set of runners added in pytorch#127566 seem to be working. Expanding to include more machine types, especially GPU machines Pull Request resolved: pytorch#127578 Approved by: https://github.com/huydhn
Part of moving pytorch/pytorch CI infra to a Linux foundation run AWS account.
For self-hosted runners that can run jobs from just a single repo, the runner scalers expect them to be stored in the repo itself.
These scale-config files define how the linux foundation's self-hosted runners are configured. These will apply to runners that only are available to the pytorch/pytorch and pytorch/pytorch-canary repos