Skip to content

Conversation

datumbox
Copy link
Contributor

@datumbox datumbox commented Jan 27, 2022

I propose to revert #4563 and temporarily switch to IntermediateLayerGetter prior the upcoming feature cut. This will give us a bit more time to test PyTorch FX and ensure that both Detection and Segmentation use the same solution. There is already a ticket for the latter at #4540, so we can keep it open to keep track of the work.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jan 27, 2022

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit ef7c337 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@datumbox datumbox requested a review from fmassa January 27, 2022 15:38
@datumbox datumbox changed the title [WIP] Temporarily use IntermediateLayerGetter on segmentation Temporarily use IntermediateLayerGetter on segmentation Jan 27, 2022
@datumbox datumbox force-pushed the segmentation/intermedia_layer branch from 6a06466 to 160e564 Compare January 27, 2022 15:49
@datumbox datumbox added the other if you have no clue or if you will manually handle the PR in the release notes label Jan 27, 2022
Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with me!

@datumbox datumbox merged commit aecbb15 into pytorch:main Jan 27, 2022
@datumbox datumbox deleted the segmentation/intermedia_layer branch January 27, 2022 17:33
@github-actions
Copy link

Hey @datumbox!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added. The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Summary: Temporarily use IntermediateLayerGetter on segmentation

Reviewed By: kazhang

Differential Revision: D33927491

fbshipit-source-id: 0151785c51d1ed15626bd3f09e5aec4d9fdbb6d1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/default cla signed other if you have no clue or if you will manually handle the PR in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants