Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Transaction #1318

Merged
merged 94 commits into from Jul 9, 2015
Merged

WIP: Transaction #1318

merged 94 commits into from Jul 9, 2015

Conversation

josenavas
Copy link
Contributor

This replaces #1262 as the amount of code that needs to be fixed there is too big.

We will create the Transaction object and use the singleton pattern across the system. This will work as long as our system continues being single-threads. As long as we have parallel processes in their own python interpreter this will not become an issue.

@josenavas josenavas added this to the Alpha 0.2 milestone Jul 1, 2015
@josenavas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixes #849

@antgonza
Copy link
Member

antgonza commented Jul 9, 2015

👍 and gonna merge as we need this live ASAP

antgonza added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2015
@antgonza antgonza merged commit 2e4daa6 into master Jul 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants