Items before etc

[michaelhkay]

No description provided.

[ndw]

In items-starting-where, the first example is:

The expression fn:items-starting-where(10 to 20, ->{. gt 12}) returns 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.

I think it would be more consistent to say it returns (13, 14, ..., 20) with parenthesis to indicate that it's a sequence. Also for the last example, (<h2/>,<img/>)

Was the addition of fn:op in this PR intentional?

[ndw]

I see what happened with fn:op. You made a PR for that, then made a new branch for this PR, but didn't go back to master first. So you got fn:op in both PRs. Let's try to remember to merge this PR and not the other one, assuming both are accepted. I imagine that if we merge #173 first, we'll get merge conflicts when we try to merge this one. 😦

[ndw]

Also: you've added fn:op to the function catalog, but you haven't referenced it from the specification itself, so it doesn't appear.

[michaelhkay]

I found myself with a GIT conflict, and fn:op found it's way in because I'm not very good at managing GIT conflicts. Sorry! Michael Kay

…

On 5 Oct 2022, at 09:45, Norman Walsh ***@***.***> wrote: Also: you've added fn:op to the function catalog, but you haven't referenced it from the specification itself, so it doesn't appear. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#177 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASIQIVEEV6N6JTXTD646CTWBU53RANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ4Y4D5Y>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

[ChristianGruen]

Proposal: #149

[ndw]

Resolved by #199, I believe.