-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22k
Simplify query in column_definitions() for Postgres #27743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify query in column_definitions() for Postgres #27743
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rails team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @senny (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. This repository is being automatically checked for code quality issues using Code Climate. You can see results for this analysis in the PR status below. Newly introduced issues should be fixed before a Pull Request is considered ready to review. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
FROM pg_attribute a | ||
LEFT JOIN pg_attrdef d ON a.attrelid = d.adrelid AND a.attnum = d.adnum | ||
LEFT JOIN pg_collation c ON a.attcollation = c.oid | ||
LEFT JOIN pg_type t on a.atttypid = t.oid AND a.attcollation <> t.typcollation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only this line's on
is lower case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
ed7db0e
to
7e2e3f2
Compare
Thanks for your review, @kamipo! What can I do to help get this PR reviewed and merged? |
Hi! Is there anything else I can do to help get an eye or two on this one? @senny Thanks! |
Could you squash your commits? |
column_definitions() needs to fetch the collation for every column, if present. Previously, it did so using a correlated subquery - a subquery that references results from the outer scope. This patch updates the query to remove the subquery in favor of a simpler and more efficient JOIN clause. Running the two queries through EXPLAIN against Postgres additionally shows that the original form with a correlated subquery requires a Nested Loop Left Join, while the new form with a simple JOIN can use a more efficient Merge Left Join.
f7c6cfa
to
f9c6cbd
Compare
Squashed and rebased. |
Thank you, @rafaelfranca! |
column_definitions() for Postgres needs to fetch the collation for every column, if present. Previously, it did so using a correlated subquery - a subquery that references results from the outer scope.
This patch updates the query to remove the subquery in favor of a simpler and more efficient JOIN clause.
Running the two queries through EXPLAIN against Postgres additionally shows that the original form with a correlated subquery requires a Nested Loop Left Join, while the new form with a simple JOIN can use a more efficient Merge Left Join.
Old plan:
New plan: