fix: Summary Context Circular Dependency

[JordanDC2]

The last circular dependency fix merely changed where the circular dependency occurred, as Footer/Summar.tsx imports from Footer/Cell.tsx and vice versa. So I Isolated the SummaryContext constant and the type it uses to its own file to break that circular import.

Verified the fix using madge https://www.npmjs.com/package/madge

[vercel]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/react-component/table/FNDKBRtyyv8qKmySXLfVrmQmhQ5f
✅ Preview: https://table-git-fork-jordandc2-fix-summary-con-a83496-react-component.vercel.app

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #754 (1f2a069) into master (9d4b3e4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 1f2a069 differs from pull request most recent head bfd8039. Consider uploading reports for the commit bfd8039 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #754   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.38%   99.38%           
=======================================
  Files          34       35    +1     
  Lines         976      976           
  Branches      281      281           
=======================================
  Hits          970      970           
  Misses          6        6           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Footer/Cell.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Footer/Summary.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Footer/index.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Footer/SummaryContext.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d4b3e4...bfd8039. Read the comment docs.

[afc163]

Could you add a test case?

[JordanDC2]

Could you add a test case?

I did not add anything new here I just moved the constant to its own file, and the coverage report already shows 100% coverage for the files i've changed. In theory the new file should already be covered by the existing tests. Am I missing something?