Sycl graph poc #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix merge conflict
Co-authored-by: Ronan Keryell <ronan@keryell.fr>
Developing doc in separate branch
EwanC
reviewed
Oct 13, 2022
| @@ -1488,6 +1489,8 @@ __SYCL_EXPORT pi_result piSamplerRelease(pi_sampler sampler); | |||
| // | |||
| // Queue Commands | |||
| // | |||
| __SYCL_EXPORT pi_result piKernelLaunch(pi_queue queue); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have an idea for an alternative approach here that doesn't involve adding a new PI entry-point, we use piQueueFlush instead. As it already exists in PI with the semantics of starting execution of work lazily scheduled, assuming it works the same as clFlush. I'd then expect a flush to happen on event wait as well as queue wait.
piQueueFlush is also more generic than just for kernel execution commands. So if in the future we wanted more than kernel launch commands to be lazily executed, we wouldn't need to add another entry-point. e.g. could lazily enqueue piEnqueueMemBufferCopy commands and flush them. Rather than having to add a piMemBufferCopy entry-point to match the piEnqueueMemBufferCopy like we've done here with piEnqueueKernelLaunch.
|
Closing that PR, rework in #5 |
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
…callback
The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications
of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`.
`TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling
a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while
`m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that
the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the
same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined
behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with
following backtrace:
```
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5);
volatile int val = *up;
return val;
}
clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp
./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b
```
```
frame #4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard
frame #5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock #2
frame #6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage
frame #7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage
...
frame #26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths
frame #27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule
frame #30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries
frame #31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule
frame #34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl
frame #35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports
frame #36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext
frame #37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState
frame #38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol
frame #41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock #1
frame #42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol
frame #43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols
frame #44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol
frame #45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence
frame #46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol
frame #47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol
frame #48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol
frame #49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup
frame #50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols
frame #51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations
frame #52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules
frame #53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject
frame #54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations
frame #55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo
frame #56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution
frame #57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse
frame #58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse
```
Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`.
**Testing**
* Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time
before the patch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2023
…est unittest
Need to finalize the DIBuilder to avoid leak sanitizer errors
like this:
Direct leak of 48 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x55c99ea1761d in operator new(unsigned long)
#1 0x55c9a518ae49 in operator new
#2 0x55c9a518ae49 in llvm::MDTuple::getImpl(...)
#3 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in getTemporary
#4 0x55c9a4f1b1ec in llvm::DIBuilder::createFunction(...)
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2023
The motivation for this change is a workload generated by the XLA compiler targeting nvidia GPUs. This kernel has a few hundred i8 loads and stores. Merging is critical for performance. The current LSV doesn't merge these well because it only considers instructions within a block of 64 loads+stores. This limit is necessary to contain the O(n^2) behavior of the pass. I'm hesitant to increase the limit, because this pass is already one of the slowest parts of compiling an XLA program. So we rewrite basically the whole thing to use a new algorithm. Before, we compared every load/store to every other to see if they're consecutive. The insight (from tra@) is that this is redundant. If we know the offset from PtrA to PtrB, then we don't need to compare PtrC to both of them in order to tell whether C may be adjacent to A or B. So that's what we do. When scanning a basic block, we maintain a list of chains, where we know the offset from every element in the chain to the first element in the chain. Each instruction gets compared only to the leaders of all the chains. In the worst case, this is still O(n^2), because all chains might be of length 1. To prevent compile time blowup, we only consider the 64 most recently used chains. Thus we do no more comparisons than before, but we have the potential to make much longer chains. This rewrite affects many tests. The changes to tests fall into two categories. 1. The old code had what appears to be a bug when deciding whether a misaligned vectorized load is fast. Suppose TTI reports that load <i32 x 4> align 4 has relative speed 1, and suppose that load i32 align 4 has relative speed 32. The intent of the code seems to be that we prefer the scalar load, because it's faster. But the old code would choose the vectorized load. accessIsMisaligned would set RelativeSpeed to 0 for the scalar load (and not even call into TTI to get the relative speed), because the scalar load is aligned. After this patch, we will prefer the scalar load if it's faster. 2. This patch changes the logic for how we vectorize. Usually this results in vectorizing more. Explanation of changes to tests: - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/flat_atomic.ll: #2, we vectorize more. - AMDGPU/int_sideeffect.ll: #2, there are two possible locations for the call to @foo, and the pass is brittle to this. Before, we'd vectorize in case 1 and not case 2. Now we vectorize in case 2 and not case 1. So we just move the call. - AMDGPU/adjust-alloca-alignment.ll: #2, we vectorize more - AMDGPU/insertion-point.ll: #2 we vectorize more - AMDGPU/merge-stores-private.ll: #1 (undoes changes from git rev 86f9117, which appear to have hit the bug from #1) - AMDGPU/multiple_tails.ll: #1 - AMDGPU/vect-ptr-ptr-size-mismatch.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - AMDGPU CodeGen: I have difficulty commenting on these changes, but many of them look like #2, we vectorize more. - NVPTX/4x2xhalf.ll: Fix alignment (I think related to #1 above). - NVPTX/vectorize_i8.ll: We don't generate <3 x i8> vectors on NVPTX because they're not legal (and eventually get split) - X86/correct-order.ll: #2, we vectorize more, probably because of changes to the chain-splitting logic. - X86/subchain-interleaved.ll: #2, we vectorize more - X86/vector-scalar.ll: #2, we can now vectorize scalar float + <1 x float> - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add-inseltpoison.ll: Deleted the nuw test because it was nonsensical. It was doing `add nuw %v0, -1`, but this is equivalent to `add nuw %v0, 0xffff'ffff`, which is equivalent to asserting that %v0 == 0. - X86/vectorize-i8-nested-add.ll: Same as nested-add-inseltpoison.ll Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149893
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
This has been flaky for a while, for example https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/50350 ``` Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision 3974d89) clang revision 3974d89 llvm revision 3974d89 "can't evaluate expressions when the process is running." ``` ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. #0 0x0000ffffa46191a0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a1a0) #1 0x0000ffffa4617144 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x5298144) #2 0x0000ffffa46198d0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a8d0) #3 0x0000ffffab25b7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffab13d050 /build/glibc-Q8DG8B/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memcpy_advsimd.S:92:0 #5 0x0000ffffa446f420 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::PrivateSetRegisterValue(unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned char>) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0420) #6 0x0000ffffa446f7b8 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::GetPrimordialRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationClient&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f07b8) #7 0x0000ffffa446f308 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegisterBytes(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0308) #8 0x0000ffffa446ec1c lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::RegisterValue&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50efc1c) #9 0x0000ffffa412eaa4 lldb_private::RegisterContext::ReadRegisterAsUnsigned(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4dafaa4) #10 0x0000ffffa420861c ReadLinuxProcessAddressMask(std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>, llvm::StringRef) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e8961c) #11 0x0000ffffa4208430 ABISysV_arm64::FixCodeAddress(unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e89430) ``` Judging by the backtrace something is trying to read the pointer authentication address/code mask registers. This explains why I've not seen this issue locally, as the buildbot runs on Graviton 3 with has the pointer authentication extension. I will try to reproduce, fix and re-enable the test.
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
…5394) Calling one of pthread join/detach interceptor on an already joined/detached thread causes asserts such as: AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56 "((t)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=1236094) #0 0x555555634f8b in __asan::CheckUnwind() compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:69:3 #1 0x55555564e06e in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:86:24 #2 0x5555556491df in __sanitizer::ThreadArgRetval::BeforeJoin(unsigned long) const compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56:3 #3 0x5555556198ed in Join<___interceptor_pthread_tryjoin_np(void*, void**)::<lambda()> > compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.h:74:26 #4 0x5555556198ed in pthread_tryjoin_np compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:311:29 The assert are replaced by error codes.
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2024
Add custom combine to lower load <3 x i8> as the more efficient sequence below: ldrb wX, [x0, #2] ldrh wY, [x0] orr wX, wY, wX, lsl #16 fmov s0, wX At the moment, there are almost no cases in which such vector operations will be generated automatically. The motivating case is non-power-of-2 SLP vectorization: llvm/llvm-project#77790
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2024
…ted #2 (intel#12655) Continuation of intel#12636. Refer to it for a description.
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that only 1 thread is running. On macOS, after pthread_join() has completed, there can be an extra thread still running which is completing the details of that task asynchronously; this causes testsuite failures. When this happens, we see the second thread is in ``` frame #0: 0x0000000180ce7700 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__ulock_wake + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d25ad4 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_joiner_wake + 52 frame #2: 0x0000000180d23c18 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate + 384 frame #3: 0x0000000180d23a98 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate_invoke + 92 frame #4: 0x0000000180d26740 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_exit + 112 frame #5: 0x0000000180d26040 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 148 ``` there are none of the functions from the test file present on this thread. In this patch, instead of counting the number of threads, I iterate over the threads looking for functions from our test file (by name) and only count threads that have at least one of them. It's a lower frequency failure than the darwin kernel bug causing an extra step instruction mach exception when hardware breakpoint/watchpoints are used, but once I fixed that, this came up as the next most common failure for these tests. rdar://110555062
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
…(#80904)" This reverts commit b1ac052. This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention functions. In this example: ```ll ; ModuleID = 'repro.ll' source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 } define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 { ret void } define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 { %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0) %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null) %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0 %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8 %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) ret void } define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 { ret ptr %0 } ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1 attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" } attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind } attributes #2 = { nounwind } ``` This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with ``` cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) LLVM ERROR: Broken function PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20 #43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335) Aborted (core dumped)
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…ter partial ordering when determining primary template (#82417)
Consider the following:
```
struct A {
static constexpr bool x = true;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::y); // #1, error: no member named 'y' in 'A'
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::x); // #2
template<>
void f(A, int*) noexcept; // explicit specialization of #2
```
We currently instantiate the exception specification of all candidate
function template specializations when deducting template arguments for
an explicit specialization, which results in a error despite `#1` not
being selected by partial ordering as the most specialized template.
According to [except.spec] p13:
> An exception specification is considered to be needed when:
> - [...]
> - the exception specification is compared to that of another
declaration (e.g., an explicit specialization or an overriding virtual
function);
Assuming that "comparing declarations" means "determining whether the
declarations correspond and declare the same entity" (per [basic.scope.scope] p4 and
[basic.link] p11.1, respectively), the exception specification does _not_ need to be
instantiated until _after_ partial ordering, at which point we determine
whether the implicitly instantiated specialization and the explicit
specialization declare the same entity (the determination of whether two
functions/function templates correspond does not consider the exception
specifications).
This patch defers the instantiation of the exception specification until
a single function template specialization is selected via partial
ordering, matching the behavior of GCC, EDG, and
MSVC: see https://godbolt.org/z/Ebb6GTcWE.
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
TestCases/Misc/Linux/sigaction.cpp fails because dlsym() may call malloc on failure. And then the wrapped malloc appears to access thread local storage using global dynamic accesses, thus calling ___interceptor___tls_get_addr, before REAL(__tls_get_addr) has been set, so we get a crash inside ___interceptor___tls_get_addr. For example, this can happen when looking up __isoc23_scanf which might not exist in some libcs. Fix this by marking the thread local variable accessed inside the debug checks as "initial-exec", which does not require __tls_get_addr. This is probably a better alternative to llvm/llvm-project#83886. This fixes a different crash but is related to llvm/llvm-project#46204. Backtrace: ``` #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff6a9d89e in ___interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0x7ffff6b27be8) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2759 #2 0x00007ffff6a46bc6 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218 #3 0x00007ffff6a448b2 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:129 #4 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:167 #5 0x00007ffff6abdbb2 in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (mu=0x730000000580, this=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:383 #6 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>::GetFromAllocator (this=0x7ffff7487dc0 <__tsan::allocator_placeholder>, stat=stat@entry=0x7ffff570db68, class_id=11, chunks=chunks@entry=0x7ffff5702cc8, n_chunks=n_chunks@entry=128) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:207 #7 0x00007ffff6abdaa0 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Refill (this=<optimized out>, c=c@entry=0x7ffff5702cb8, allocator=<optimized out>, class_id=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:103 #8 0x00007ffff6abd731 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Allocate (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, allocator=0x7ffff5702cc8, class_id=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:39 #9 0x00007ffff6abc397 in __sanitizer::CombinedAllocator<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>, __sanitizer::LargeMmapAllocatorPtrArrayDynamic>::Allocate (this=0x7ffff5702cc8, cache=0x7ffff6b27be8, size=<optimized out>, size@entry=175, alignment=alignment@entry=16) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_combined.h:69 #10 0x00007ffff6abaa6a in __tsan::user_alloc_internal (thr=0x7ffff7ebd980, pc=140737331499943, sz=sz@entry=175, align=align@entry=16, signal=true) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:198 #11 0x00007ffff6abb0d1 in __tsan::user_alloc (thr=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066, sz=11, sz@entry=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:223 #12 0x00007ffff6a693b5 in ___interceptor_malloc (size=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:666 #13 0x00007ffff7fce7f2 in malloc (size=175) at ../include/rtld-malloc.h:56 #14 __GI__dl_exception_create_format (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd0d0, objname=0x7ffff7fc3550 "/path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/cmake-build-all-sanitizers/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.so", fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7ff2db9 "undefined symbol: %s%s%s") at ./elf/dl-exception.c:157 #15 0x00007ffff7fd50e8 in _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", undef_map=<optimized out>, ref=0x7fffffffd148, symbol_scope=<optimized out>, version=<optimized out>, type_class=0, flags=2, skip_map=0x7ffff7fc35e0) at ./elf/dl-lookup.c:793 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #16 0x00007ffff656d6ed in do_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", who=0x7ffff6a3bb84 <__interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long)+36>, vers=vers@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=2) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:146 #17 0x00007ffff656d9dd in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:195 #18 0x00007ffff64a2854 in dlsym_doit (a=a@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:40 #19 0x00007ffff7fcc489 in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd310, operate=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #20 0x00007ffff7fcc5af in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7fffffffd368, errstring=0x7fffffffd370, mallocedp=0x7fffffffd367, operate=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #21 0x00007ffff64a2257 in _dlerror_run (operate=operate@entry=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #22 0x00007ffff64a28e5 in dlsym_implementation (dl_caller=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, handle=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:54 #23 ___dlsym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:68 #24 0x00007ffff6a3bb84 in __interception::GetFuncAddr (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:42 #25 __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", ptr_to_real=0x7ffff74850e8 <__interception::real___isoc23_scanf>, func=11, trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:61 #26 0x00007ffff6a9f2d9 in InitializeCommonInterceptors () at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:10315 ``` Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay Pull Request: llvm/llvm-project#83890
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2024
This reverts commit daebe5c. This commit causes the following asan issue: ``` <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir | <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/FileCheck <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # executed command: <snip>/llvm-project/build/bin/mlir-opt <snip>/llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/XeGPU/XeGPUOps.mlir # .---command stderr------------ # | ================================================================= # | ==2772558==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7fd2c2c42b90 at pc 0x55e406d54614 bp 0x7ffc810e4070 sp 0x7ffc810e4068 # | READ of size 8 at 0x7fd2c2c42b90 thread T0 # | #0 0x55e406d54613 in operator()<long int const*> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/predefined_ops.h:318 # | #1 0x55e406d54613 in __count_if<long int const*, __gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, llvm::StringRef, unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<long int>, ValueRange)::<lambda(int64_t)> > > /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_algobase.h:2125 # | #2 0x55e406d54613 in count_if<long int const*, mlir::verifyListOfOperandsOrIntegers(Operation*, ... ```
fabiomestre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
…oint. (#83821)" This reverts commit c2c1e6e. It creates a use after free. ==8342==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x50f000001760 at pc 0x55b9fb84a8fb bp 0x7ffc18468a10 sp 0x7ffc18468a08 READ of size 1 at 0x50f000001760 thread T0 #0 0x55b9fb84a8fa in dropPoisonGeneratingFlags llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h:1040:13 #1 0x55b9fb84a8fa in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>)::$_0::operator()(llvm::VPRecipeBase*) const llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp:1236:23 #2 0x55b9fb84a196 in llvm::VPlanTransforms::dropPoisonGeneratingRecipes(llvm::VPlan&, llvm::function_ref<bool (llvm::BasicBlock*)>) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp Can be reproduced with asan on Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-interleaved-masked-accesses.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr81872.ll Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/x86-interleaved-accesses-masked-group.ll
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2024
…ntel#13604) This is try #2 for this - original change was suspected of breaking the device library builds. This change represents 2 changes. 1. Update the build to create LLVM-IR based device libraries. This is done by using the existing -fsycl-device-only functionality to create the device libraries that are used during device link. 2. Update the compiler driver to use the LLVM-IR based device libraries. When performing the device linking instead of performing a full unbundle of the device libraries and using the device binary that was extracted. This streamlines the device linking behaviors, completely removing the cumbersome unbundling step from the process, freeing up a number of exteral tool calls.
fabiomestre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2024
…e exception specification of a function (#90760)
[temp.deduct.general] p6 states:
> At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is
necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters
and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template
arguments.
This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any
explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the
function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when
any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default
arguments are substituted.
[temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say:
> The _deduction substitution loci_ are
> - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_,
> - the explicit-specifier,
> - the template parameter declarations, and
> - the template argument list of a partial specialization
>
> The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in
the deduction substitution loci. [...]
Consider the following:
```cpp
struct A
{
static constexpr bool x = true;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2
template<>
void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject
```
Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute
into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a
function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the
address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a
SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary
template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into
the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate
being ignored.
This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and
this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the
_noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated.
As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the
instantiation of the exception specification of a function template
specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed
to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per
[except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).
fabiomestre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2024
…ined member functions & member function templates (#88963)
Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector:
```
template<typename T>
concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long);
template<typename T>
struct A
{
template<typename U>
void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template
void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function
template<>
void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
};
template<>
template<typename U>
void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template
template<>
template<>
void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
template<>
void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function
```
A number of problems exist:
- Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U`
substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it
matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated
function template.
- Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization
instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5`
does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function).
- Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`.
This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes:
- To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed
`FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_
of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`.
- To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared
for explicit specializations that declare functions.
In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers
constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining
which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a
member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we
previously would select the first function that has the same type as the
explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we
match EDG's behavior for these declarations.
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > #5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > #6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@allotropia.de>
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
…ication as used during partial ordering (#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
…erSize (#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 #5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 #6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
…0820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses: 1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the compute constructs however. 2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a 'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though we do. 3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet the requirements of #2. This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
… (#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm/llvm-project#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.
kbenzie
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
….5) The Python interpreter in Xcode cannot be copied because of a relative RPATH. Our workaround would just use that Python interpreter directly when it detects this. For the reasons explained in my previous commit, that doesn't work in a virtual environment. Address this case by creating a symlink to the "real" interpreter in the virtual environment.
kbenzie
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
…on (#94752)
Fixes #62925.
The following code:
```cpp
#include <map>
int main() {
std::map m1 = {std::pair{"foo", 2}, {"bar", 3}}; // guide #2
std::map m2(m1.begin(), m1.end()); // guide #1
}
```
Is rejected by clang, but accepted by both gcc and msvc:
https://godbolt.org/z/6v4fvabb5 .
So basically CTAD with copy-list-initialization is rejected.
Note that this exact code is also used in a cppreference article:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/deduction_guides
I checked the C++11 and C++20 standard drafts to see whether suppressing
user conversion is the correct thing to do for user conversions. Based
on the standard I don't think that it is correct.
```
13.3.1.4 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy]
Under the conditions specified in 8.5, as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined
conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized.
Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked
```
So we could use user defined conversions according to the standard.
```
If a narrowing conversion is required to initialize any of the elements, the
program is ill-formed.
```
We should not do narrowing.
```
In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed.
```
We should not use explicit constructors.
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2024
This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's `__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a `__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in order for debuggers to display it to a user. The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter a frame with a function name that begins with `__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps. Once such frame is encountered we display the frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the user. Example output: ``` (lldb) run warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available. Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64) Process 35942 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] 1 struct Dummy { 2 void func() { -> 3 __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented"); 4 } 5 }; 6 7 int main() { (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt] * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] frame #2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt] frame #3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988 ```
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2024
It is named var instead of number now, update the regex. After llvm/llvm-project@9ad72df From: ``` %0 = load i13, ptr addrspace(4) %a.addr.ascast, align 2, !tbaa !7 %call = call spir_func signext i5 @_Z22__spirv_FixedSqrtINTELILi13ELi5EEDBT0__DBT__biiii(i13 signext %0, i1 zeroext false, i32 2, i32 2, i32 0, i32 0) #2 ``` to: ``` %0 = load i16, ptr addrspace(4) %a.addr.ascast, align 2, !tbaa !7 %loadedv = trunc i16 %0 to i13 %call = call spir_func signext i5 @_Z22__spirv_FixedSqrtINTELILi13ELi5EEDBT0__DBT__biiii(i13 signext %loadedv, i1 zeroext false, i32 2, i32 2, i32 0, i32 0) #2 ```
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
…linux (#99613)
Examples of the output:
ARM:
```
# ./a.out
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0)
==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==122==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x76e13ac0 (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0)
#1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680)
#2 0x005c2250 (/root/a.out+0x145250)
#3 0x76db982c (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c)
#4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918)
==122==Register values:
r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x0000007a r2 = 0x0000000b r3 = 0x76d95020
r4 = 0x0000007a r5 = 0x00000001 r6 = 0x005dcc5c r7 = 0x0000010c
r8 = 0x0000000b r9 = 0x76f9ece0 r10 = 0x00000000 r11 = 0x7eb7fd00
r12 = 0x76dce670 sp = 0x7eb7fcc8 lr = 0x76e13ab4 pc = 0x76e13ac0
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0)
==122==ABORTING
```
AArch64:
```
# ./a.out
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99)
==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access.
==99==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x007fbbbc5860 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860)
#1 0x007fbbb81578 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578)
#2 0x00556051152c (/root/a.out+0x3152c)
#3 0x007fbbb6e268 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268)
#4 0x007fbbb6e344 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344)
#5 0x0055604e45ec (/root/a.out+0x45ec)
==99==Register values:
x0 = 0x0000000000000000 x1 = 0x0000000000000063 x2 = 0x000000000000000b x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440
x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580 x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce x6 = 0x0000000000000000 x7 = 0x00000055605110b0
x8 = 0x0000000000000083 x9 = 0x0000000000000000 x10 = 0x0000000000000000 x11 = 0x0000000000000000
x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360 x13 = 0x0000000000010000 x14 = 0x0000000000000039 x15 = 0x00000000004113a0
x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560 x17 = 0x0000005560540138 x18 = 0x000000006474e552 x19 = 0x0000000000000063
x20 = 0x0000000000000001 x21 = 0x000000000000000b x22 = 0x0000005560511510 x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918
x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50 x25 = 0x0000000000000000 x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000 x27 = 0x000000556053f858
x28 = 0x0000000000000000 fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860)
==99==ABORTING
```
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2024
```
UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp
```
`FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the
test isn't Linux-specific at all). With
`UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a
duplicate innermost frame:
```
compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value
#0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
#1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
#2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38
```
which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`.
This turns out to be another fallout from fixing
`__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In
`sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the
`pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame
(`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double
entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`.
This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses.
Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`
(with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).
aarongreig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Currently, process of replacing bitwise operations consisting of
`LSR`/`LSL` with `And` is performed by `DAGCombiner`.
However, in certain cases, the `AND` generated by this process
can be removed.
Consider following case:
```
lsr x8, x8, #56
and x8, x8, #0xfc
ldr w0, [x2, x8]
ret
```
In this case, we can remove the `AND` by changing the target of `LDR`
to `[X2, X8, LSL #2]` and right-shifting amount change to 56 to 58.
after changed:
```
lsr x8, x8, #58
ldr w0, [x2, x8, lsl #2]
ret
```
This patch checks to see if the `SHIFTING` + `AND` operation on load
target can be optimized and optimizes it if it can.
aarongreig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before
completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in
`OnEmitted` callback.
Original error:
```
==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978
READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm)
#0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58
#1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25
#2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5
#3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12
#4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr,
```
aarongreig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Static destructor can race with calls to notify and trigger tsan
warning.
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=5787)
Write of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T23:
#0 pthread_mutex_destroy [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1344](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1344&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12affb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:91](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=91&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::~recursive_mutex() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:52](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=52&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9)
#3 ~SmartMutex [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:28](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=28&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#4 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::~PerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:65](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=65&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe)
#5 cxa_at_exit_callback_installed_at(void*) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:437](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=437&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b172cb9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#6 llvm::JITEventListener::createPerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:496](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=496&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcad8f5) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
```
```
Previous atomic read of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T192 (mutexes: write M0, write M1):
#0 pthread_mutex_unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1387](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1387&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12b6bb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:87](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=87&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::unlock() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:64](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=64&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589)
#3 unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:47](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=47&cl=669089572):16 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
#4 ~lock_guard [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h:39](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h?l=39&cl=669089572):101 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968)
#5 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::notifyObjectLoaded(unsigned long, llvm::object::ObjectFile const&, llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo const&) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:290](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=290&cl=669089572):1 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968)
#6 llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjEmit(llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility&, llvm::object::OwningBinary<llvm::object::ObjectFile>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>>>, llvm::Error) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:386](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp?l=386&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bc404a8) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
```
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
When SPARC Asan testing is enabled by PR #107405, many Linux/sparc64 tests just hang like ``` #0 0xf7ae8e90 in syscall () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 #1 0x701065e8 in __sanitizer::FutexWait(__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t*, unsigned int) () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp:766 #2 0x70107c90 in Wait () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35 #3 0x700f7cac in Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:196 #4 Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_registry.h:98 #5 LockThreads () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_thread.cpp:489 #6 0x700e9c8c in __asan::BeforeFork() () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_posix.cpp:157 #7 0xf7ac83f4 in ?? () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) ``` It turns out that this happens in tests using `internal_fork` (e.g. invoking `llvm-symbolizer`): unlike most other Linux targets, which use `clone`, Linux/sparc64 has to use `__fork` instead. While `clone` doesn't trigger `pthread_atfork` handlers, `__fork` obviously does, causing the hang. To avoid this, this patch disables `InstallAtForkHandler` and lets the ASan tests run to completion. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
…ap (#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.