add repr method for Rule, Dataset.

[Ankush-Chander]

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Closes #2046

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. And ideally reference tests.

import argilla as rg
from argilla.labeling.text_classification.rule import Rule

plz = Rule(query="plz OR please", label="SPAM")
print(repr(plz))
>>> Rule(query='plz OR please', label='SPAM', name='plz OR please')


records = [
        rg.TextClassificationRecord(text="example"),
        rg.TextClassificationRecord(text="another example"),
        rg.TextClassificationRecord(text="another example another example another example another example another example another example"),
    ]
dataset = rg.DatasetForTextClassification(records=records)
print(dataset)
>>>
    	text                          	annotation	prediction
0   	example                       	None      	None      
1   	another example               	None      	None      
2   	another example another exampl	None      	None      
...
3 TextClassificationRecord records

Checklist

• I have merged the original branch into my forked branch
• I added relevant documentation
• follows the style guidelines of this project
• I did a self-review of my code
• I added comments to my code
• I made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 94.30% // Head: 94.34% // Increases project coverage by +0.04% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (2b6526c) compared to base (3aa0c55).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 2b6526c differs from pull request most recent head 2234032. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2234032 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2148      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    94.30%   94.34%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          151      151              
  Lines         7218     7218              
===========================================
+ Hits          6807     6810       +3     
+ Misses         411      408       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	94.34% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/argilla/client/datasets.py	85.19% <ø> (ø)
src/argilla/labeling/text_classification/rule.py	97.05% <ø> (ø)
...gilla/labeling/text_classification/label_errors.py	90.36% <0.00%> (+3.61%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[davidberenstein1957]

Hi @Ankush-Chander, it looks great:) Could you perhaps also add a __repr__ for the API client, which exposes the active workspace and potentially available workspaces, URL/host and available datasets?

[davidberenstein1957]

This looks great:)

[davidberenstein1957]

Also, perhaps the __repr__ of TokenClassificationRecord, TextClassificationRecord, and Text2TexClassificationRecord can be limited a bit by cutting the str of text and the tokens

[davidberenstein1957]

Thanks for the great work @Ankush-Chander 👍

[frascuchon]

Nice work !! Thanks @Ankush-Chander