Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-apply isVoid() (#3574) #3586

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 8, 2023
Merged

Re-apply isVoid() (#3574) #3586

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 8, 2023

Conversation

samsonasik
Copy link
Member

@TomasVotruba @yguedidi let's try re-apply is* check, starting with possibly most safe usage, isVoid()

@yguedidi
Copy link
Contributor

yguedidi commented Apr 8, 2023

@samsonasik wouldn't it be better if I re-do the commits but more careful about rector being pass?

@samsonasik
Copy link
Member Author

I think most issues are integer and string type, so I pick most possible safe type to back, as I can see all green on this, let's merge ;)

@samsonasik samsonasik merged commit a6ca5a0 into main Apr 8, 2023
@samsonasik samsonasik deleted the re-apply-is-void branch April 8, 2023 13:56
@TomasVotruba
Copy link
Member

@yguedidi You can also see Rector contributing here. If it would fail, we'd see in its commits

@yguedidi
Copy link
Contributor

yguedidi commented Apr 8, 2023

Nice tip! thank you

samsonasik added a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
* Use isVoid() (#3574)

* [ci-review] Rector Rectify

* [ci-review] Rector Rectify

* [ci-review] Rector Rectify

---------

Co-authored-by: Yassine Guedidi <yassine@guedidi.com>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <actions@github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants