TurtleParse produces invalid parsing tree (W3C manifest.ttl)

[cordawyn]

Parsing the following:

<#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible> a mf:NegativeEntailmentTest;
  mf:name "datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible";
  rdfs:comment """
    The claim that xsd:integer is a subClassOF xsd:decimal is not
    incompatible with using the intensional semantics for
    datatypes.
  """;
  rdfs:approval rdft:Approved;
  mf:entailmentRegime "RDFS" ;
  mf:recognizedDatatypes ( xsd:decimal xsd:integer ) ;
  mf:unrecognizedDatatypes ( ) ;
  mf:action <datatypes-intensional/test001.nt>;
  mf:result false .

(from http://www.w3.org/2013/rdf-mt-tests/manifest.ttl) produces invalid output:

Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#NegativeEntailmentTest"))
Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#name"),LNode(PlainL(datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible)))
Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"),LNode(PlainL(
    The claim that xsd:integer is a subClassOF xsd:decimal is not
    incompatible with using the intensional semantics for
    datatypes.
  )))
Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#approval"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/ns/rdftest#Approved"))
Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#entailmentRegime"),LNode(PlainL(RDFS)))
Triple(UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#recognizedDatatypes"),BNodeGen(40))
Triple(BNodeGen(40),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal"))
Triple(BNodeGen(40),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest"),BNodeGen(41))
Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer"))
Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"))
Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#unrecognizedDatatypes"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"))
Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#action"),UNode("xxxdatatypes-intensional/test001.nt"))
Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#result"),LNode(TypedL(false,"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean")))

Note that it breaks on Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#unrecognizedDatatypes"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil")) where "subject" must be UNode("xxx#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible"), not BNodeGen(41).
Also, the last 2 triples must also have UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#unrecognizedDatatypes") for their subject.

However, parsing of a list with mf:entries (earlier in this file) is correct.

So, the parser either stumbled on "inline" presentation of a list, trailing ";" or something in between ;-)

[robstewart57]

The last two triples should have the subject UNode("#datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-decimal-compatible") I think. I can reproduce the first problem you report about Triple(BNodeGen(41),UNode("http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#unrecognizedDatatypes"),UNode("http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil")) , I'll take a look.

[cordawyn]

You're right about the subject of the last 2 triples.