Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverted WaitForTopics utility usage #326

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 12, 2021

Conversation

adityapande-1995
Copy link
Contributor

Removed usage of the WaitForTopics utiity that was reverted in ros2/launch_ros#276

Signed-off-by: Aditya Pande aditya050995@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Aditya Pande <aditya050995@gmail.com>
rclpy.shutdown()


class DummyNode(Node):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would call this WaitForTopics.

If you prefer, we can leave the test above unchanged and just copy the entire WaitForTopics from ros2/launch_ros#274 here.

Either way, we should add a comment TODO here to move the implementation back to launch_ros after ros2/rclpy#831 is resolved.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved entire implementation, added a TODO comment

Signed-off-by: Aditya Pande <aditya050995@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Pande <aditya050995@gmail.com>
@Blast545
Copy link

Thanks @adityapande-1995! FYI the revert is being addressed here: launch_ros#278

Full CI: --packages-above-and-dependencies launch_testing_examples rclpy ament_package launch_ros

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@adityapande-1995 adityapande-1995 merged commit bf3740d into master Oct 12, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the aditya/remove_wait_for_topic_action branch October 12, 2021 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants