-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge apex_launchtest functionality into launch_testing #215
Conversation
0f4e4ae
to
a8c4fa3
Compare
a8c4fa3
to
e22665a
Compare
1a38815
to
9e7447e
Compare
I'll rebase after fixing this on Windows (which I suspect wasn't supported to begin with). |
…ment_cmake. Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
* Migrate launch_testing action tests into it. Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
9c9f40f
to
8826a6a
Compare
Alright, all tests are passing but for a few unrelated, known failures! Running a linux packaging job just in case. |
What is the purpose of having the package |
Basically, yes. According to what we discussed with @wjwwood, the idea is to keep core |
Also, to keep |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left some comments, but it looks good to me.
About the license, we will only left the APEX copyright on the top of the files, right?
For example in launch_testing/example_processes/exit_code_proc
.
I forgot to add, that I'm seeing an error when I locally do:
It's not finding mock, but maybe it's a local problem in my environment. |
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Nope,
They authored most of it, so yes. We did some changes, not sure if we should add OSRF's too. Maybe @dirk-thomas or @wjwwood know? |
@ivanpauno thank you for the review man! :D |
It's appropriate to add OSRF to the copyright if we modified in some significant way, though that line is sort of arbitrary and if you don't add it, then it's not the end of the world. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've skimmed through this and it LGTM too!
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
59087a2
to
639d0da
Compare
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
639d0da
to
7965b50
Compare
Alright, CI failures are unrelated. Can I get another approval after latest changes? |
This pull request merges functionality from
apex_launchtest
andapex_launchtest_cmake
packages intolaunch_testing
andlaunch_testing_ament_cmake
respectively. Some renaming and style corrections were applied as well.Additionally, a new package
test_launch_testing
is introduced to avoidlaunch_testing
from being anament_cmake
type of package.Connected to #208.