-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Quality Declaration for typesupport_introspection #621
Quality Declaration for typesupport_introspection #621
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <eb@ilities.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eboasson First, thanks for doing this. I know it is tedious, having done a bunch myself.
Inline I've left a bunch of comments. They are all minor wording changes, so once those are fixed up I think we'll be good to go in getting this in.
Co-authored-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <eb@ilities.com>
e366d21
to
ae52df7
Compare
@clalancette all sensible suggestions and no further changes. Because DCO test failed I've squashed the edits and force-pushed them as a single commit. |
@ros-pull-request-builder retest this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The CI failure is annoying, but is elsewhere in the stack (we are working on that separately). Since this is only a documentation change, I'm going to go ahead and merge it. Thanks again!
This is derived from the regular
rosidl_typesupport_cpp
quality declaration, but adapted to the specifics of the introspection type supports. In particular it claims QL3 because of the absence of documentation.