Skip to content

Warnings when using deprecated :overflow_policy thread pool option #202

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2014

Conversation

jdantonio
Copy link
Member

  • Thread pools still accept the :overflow_policy option but display a warning
  • Updated changelog with post-0.7.1 updates

Finished work began in PRs #199 and #201. Completes enhancement suggested in issue #192.

jdantonio added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2014
…warnings

Warnings when using deprecated :overflow_policy thread pool option
@jdantonio jdantonio merged commit f104631 into master Dec 8, 2014
@jdantonio jdantonio deleted the refactor/changelog-and-warnings branch December 8, 2014 16:07
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.09%) when pulling 521ef52 on refactor/changelog-and-warnings into 0d43d21 on master.

@@ -342,8 +342,8 @@
end
end

context '#overflow_policy' do
context ':caller_runs is honoured even if the old overflow_policy arg is used' do
context '#fallback_policy' do
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah - this one wasn't something I accidentally missed. It's a test to make sure we're backwards-compatible with :overflow_policy.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah. Sorry about that. That's what I get for doing is simple search/replace! :-) I'll fix it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in this commit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants