Skip to content

Add the irq crate #245

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2020
Merged

Add the irq crate #245

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2020

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @rahul-thakoor

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-resources labels Jan 26, 2020
Copy link
Member

@andre-richter andre-richter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors does not check reviews for commands, only normal comments

@adamgreig
Copy link
Member

I'm sure bors does or used to check review comments for commands, it's how I've almost always r+'d PRs. Has it changed recently?

@jamesmunns
Copy link
Member

bors r=andre-richter

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2020
245: Add the `irq` crate r=andre-richter a=jonas-schievink



Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
@andre-richter
Copy link
Member

Yup done it this way since a long time. Strange...

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jan 26, 2020

Already running a review

@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Huh, weird

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jan 26, 2020

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit e03eda4 into rust-embedded:master Jan 26, 2020
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the patch-2 branch January 26, 2020 16:09
@jamesmunns
Copy link
Member

If anyone is investigating, I also wonder if Github could have changed the way bors “sees” comments that originate from review comments. Ill do separate review and bors steps from now on though.

@adamgreig
Copy link
Member

Looks like it's already filed: bors-ng/bors-ng#855

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-resources
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants