Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libunwind changes needed to run code in sgx environment via rust-sgx. #63

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

libunwind changes needed to run code in sgx environment via rust-sgx. #63

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AdrianCX
Copy link

Updated branch in response to: #57 (comment)

Please advise on process as this is the first PR against rust-lang's llvm and I tried to follow instructions as close as possible..

Ticket: fortanix/rust-sgx#174

Description: libunwind changes needed to run code in sgx environment via rust-sgx.

Target that uses this in rust: x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx.
Rust-lang PR depends on this - plan is to raise it if this PR is accepted.

Without this change, rust std for this toolchain is forced to use a precompiled library loaded via environment variable.

Code is guarded via defines to enable only if 'RUST_SGX' is present.

Main logic is in libunwind/src/AddressSpace.hpp

We use 6 symbols to figure out where eh_frame / eh_frame_hdr is at runtime when loaded in an SGX enclave. (EH symbols + IMAGE base)
These are set when elf is converged to sgx format by 'fortanix-sgx-tools'.

Original ported changes: llvm/llvm-project@release/5.x...fortanix:release/5.x

Code is guarded via defines to enable only if 'RUST_SGX' is present.

Main logic is in libunwind/src/AddressSpace.hpp
We use 6 symbols to figure out where eh_frame / eh_frame_hdr is at runtime when loaded in an SGX enclave. (EH symbols + IMAGE base)
These are set by 'fortanix-sgx-tools'.

As notes:
- Target above at the moment uses a pre-compiled libunwind.a from forked repo.
- Goal of these changes is to use official llvm with patch.
- Changes in rust-lang to use this are planned if/when this is accepted.
- Ticket: fortanix/rust-sgx#174
- Original ported changes: llvm/llvm-project@release/5.x...fortanix:release/5.x
@AdrianCX AdrianCX closed this May 26, 2020
vext01 added a commit to vext01/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2023
63: Kill some dead code in the control point pass. r=ltratt a=vext01



Co-authored-by: Edd Barrett <vext01@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant