Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[yyyy] [name of copyright owner] #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2015
Merged

[yyyy] [name of copyright owner] #117

merged 1 commit into from Aug 28, 2015

Conversation

@edunham
Copy link
Member

@edunham edunham commented Aug 28, 2015

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

@rust-highfive rust-highfive commented Aug 28, 2015

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

BurntSushi added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2015
[yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
@BurntSushi BurntSushi merged commit 2b1b982 into rust-lang:master Aug 28, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@BurntSushi
Copy link
Member

@BurntSushi BurntSushi commented Aug 28, 2015

Thanks!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton alexcrichton commented Aug 28, 2015

This has actually been proposed before in rust-lang/rust multiple times almost, and this is actually an appending that's supposed to be filler text apparently?

@edunham
Copy link
Member Author

@edunham edunham commented Aug 28, 2015

@alexcrichton You're right; I lost the section change in the other legal boilerplate. New PR incoming to nuke said boilerplate and move the line according to its instructions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants