Skip to content

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor commented Jan 6, 2020

On rustc diagnostics, we prefer to use backticks over ', ", or something else. I think we should follow their manner here.
In first commit, normalizes lint messages with backticks.
In second commit, updates all stderrs.
In third commit, updates descriptions on lintlist.

changelog: none

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Jan 6, 2020

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 6, 2020

📌 Commit c20642e has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 6, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c20642e with merge e2187c9...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2020
Normalize lint messages

On rustc diagnostics, we prefer to use backticks over `'`,  `"`, or something else. I think we should follow their manner here.
In first commit, normalizes lint messages with backticks.
In second commit, updates all stderrs.
In third commit, updates descriptions on lintlist.

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 6, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors label Jan 6, 2020
@JohnTitor JohnTitor added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Jan 7, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5011) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, rebased.

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Jan 7, 2020

@bors r=flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

📌 Commit f7a93f0 has been approved by flip1995

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
Normalize lint messages

On rustc diagnostics, we prefer to use backticks over `'`,  `"`, or something else. I think we should follow their manner here.
In first commit, normalizes lint messages with backticks.
In second commit, updates all stderrs.
In third commit, updates descriptions on lintlist.

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

⌛ Testing commit f7a93f0 with merge f5a0d9d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

Uhm, I should have taken note of 32-bit target, fixed hopefully.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Jan 7, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

📌 Commit abc49c3 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

⌛ Testing commit abc49c3 with merge c092068...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
Normalize lint messages

On rustc diagnostics, we prefer to use backticks over `'`,  `"`, or something else. I think we should follow their manner here.
In first commit, normalizes lint messages with backticks.
In second commit, updates all stderrs.
In third commit, updates descriptions on lintlist.

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 7, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing c092068 to master...

@bors bors merged commit abc49c3 into rust-lang:master Jan 7, 2020
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the backticks branch January 7, 2020 12:40
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
Normalize lint messages in cast_precision_loss

Follow-up of #5000

changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants