Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tutorial: two kinds of box? #14503

Closed
ambimorph opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #16657
Closed

tutorial: two kinds of box? #14503

ambimorph opened this issue May 29, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #16657

Comments

@ambimorph
Copy link

In http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/tutorial.html#ownership, both the just-introduced box operator is used, and a previously unseen parameterised type, Box. The latter is not introduced until http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/tutorial.html#boxes, where it is called an "owned box". This was confusing to my partner, who said "Aren't all objects owned? Is there such thing as a non-owned object?".

@ambimorph
Copy link
Author

A few sentences further, it appears "owned" means single owner?

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Yes, this terminology has certainly gotten a bit weird.

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2014
The Guide isn't 100% perfect, but it's basically complete. It's
certainly better than the tutorial is. Time to start pointing more
people its way.

I also just made it consistent to call all things 'guides' rather than
tutorials.

Fixes rust-lang#9874. This is the big one.

And two bugs that just go away.

Fixes rust-lang#14503.
Fixes rust-lang#15009.
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2014
The Guide isn't 100% perfect, but it's basically complete. It's
certainly better than the tutorial is. Time to start pointing more
people its way.

I also just made it consistent to call all things 'guides' rather than
tutorials.

Fixes #9874. This is the big one.

And two bugs that just go away.

Fixes #14503.
Fixes #15009.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants